this post was submitted on 11 May 2026
318 points (96.0% liked)

Selfhosted

56958 readers
808 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

  7. No low-effort posts. This is subjective and will largely be determined by the community member reports.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] irotsoma@piefed.blahaj.zone -1 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

Plex prices are expensive just to access your own media. Tailscale can do it for free.

Tailscale isn't exactly free. It requires a lot more knowledge, configuration, maintenance, etc, than Plex alone.

Sure, many self-hosters have the ability to figure it out and the proper networking and/or server hardware to implement it. But many Plex users aren't really self-hosters in that sense. Hosting a local media server that deals with all of the networking stuff for you is much easier than maintaining a tailscale or similar setup on top of the media server stuff. I mean for me, if I hadn't gotten a lifetime Plex Pass early on for cheap, I probably would have put more effort into my Jellyfin setup. But Plex mostly just works and I have other bigger priorities. I hate the functionality they've removed that makes things more difficult than it should be, or I wouldn't be switching, but it's not all that bad. So if I didn't have the expertise and hardware already, I could see it being worth the money to stick with it.

[–] potustheplant@feddit.nl 7 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

Tailscale is as simplified as it gets and it doesn't require any knowledge, configuration or maintenance. The fact that you can use it for free makes me wary, but you can't deny how simple it is to use. Just log in with your account in all of the devices you want to access jellyfin on and voila. It's as if they were in the same lan.

[–] freebee@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 hours ago

I think their idea behind it is to convince relatively tech savvy people how great it works (it does) so they talk about it in their relatively tech savvy professional role at small and medium companies.

And at some point they will either start charging money for the small time user, or it will turn to shit, or both. You just know it will happen, the question is when not if. It isn't free, it's corporate.

[–] Fuzzypyro@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Honestly it is kind of wild that they have a cap on how many devices you can use at all. They store so little it’s wild. The thing that makes it really worth being a service is the relay network they handle and the fact that you can support the team building awesome features into the client. That being said headscale is a thing and if you wanna demystify it then you should take a look at that project. The tailscale docs have tons of info about how they operate under the hood too.

[–] potustheplant@feddit.nl 1 points 4 hours ago

My problem in the first place is that due to my ISP 's limitations, I can't run wireguard. If I could run it, I would do that instead of using headscale.

[–] Hominine@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

I skipped tailscale, so feel free to ignore me, but Netbird has been excellent and has no limitations I'm aware of.

[–] Damage@feddit.it 2 points 6 hours ago

Yeah so I've set up remote access to two different homes, one where the router was facing the internet directly, and that was easy, setting up a reverse proxy is not for the average user, but neither is other stuff involved in this sort of system.

Then at another place, where the router was behind cgnat and therefore could not perform its own nat, I set up a wireguard connection to a VPS that itself hosted the reverse proxy... Homemade tailscale, sorta. That was a bit complicated, I don't think most people have the patience for that.