this post was submitted on 11 May 2026
188 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

86580 readers
3227 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Brewchin@lemmy.world 84 points 2 months ago (5 children)

I think my irony meter just broke. The company that takes freely published papers* and paywalls them for extortionate profit is mad that that someone else is making money off free content?

I propose a trial by mortal combat. It's the only logical solution.


*You'll be hard pressed to find a published researcher who thinks well of the Elsevier distribution monopoly, and it's even harder to find one that won't send you a PDF copy for free if you just ask for it.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 21 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Indeed. I'm not sure who to root against in this one.

[–] amateurcrastinator@lemmy.world 18 points 2 months ago

I am truly hoping that they will destroy each other. These are two tumors of our civilization. One is lodged in our society and is eating our humanity and social interactions, the other is eating away our knowledge and innovation.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 2 points 2 months ago
[–] fushuan@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 2 months ago

By freely published you mean papers that are published by paying them, right?

They take money for papers to be published, they force researchers to freely peer review, and then they paywall the fuck out of that paper. It's one of the biggest scams I've ever read about, 10 years ago... Thank god computer science, math and physics (basically most STEM) have arXiv...

[–] Einskjaldi@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They also have the worst website that never works even if you have access

[–] cows_are_underrated@feddit.org 1 points 2 months ago

I would agree, that some parts of the Elsevier website are quite shit but I would not come even close to saying its unusable in any form.

[–] General_Effort@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

There's no irony there. It's what Elsevier does. They have no qualms about looting research budgets and sabotaging science in the process. They won't make an exception for open source AI.

[–] ranzispa@mander.xyz 2 points 2 months ago

Saint Elbakyan, please redeem us. Give us our daily papers and don't lead us to paid open access.