this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2025
446 points (96.5% liked)

Technology

75645 readers
3499 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Deflated0ne@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If your job can be automated. Your job will be automated. Even if the work it produces is hot runny shit.

They would rather pump out pure garbage than pay an honest wage for honest work. It doesn't even have to work. They'll just put an arbitration clause in the EULA. Then sit back and count their money.

[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's not how companies work. The CEO has a fiduciary duty to maximize company gains, so they have to invest in AI, because it's more profitable. They don't even have a choice, if they want to keep their job.

The current crisis has nothing to do with the individual decisions of a single CEO. It's a legal issue, i.e. CEOs could only act differently if there was a significant and serious change in the way that the law requires them to operate. Which, all things considered, is unreasonable in this case.

[–] Deflated0ne@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

They wouldn't act differently. Watch 1 hour of CNBC. Those people only technically qualify as human.