Authoritarianism is a political system characterized by the rejection of political plurality, the use of strong central power to preserve the political status quo, and reductions in democracy, separation of powers, civil liberties, and the rule of law. Authoritarian regimes may be either autocratic or oligarchic and may be based upon the rule of a party, the military, or the concentration of power in a single person.

-Wikipedia
A funny thing about Wikipedias short description here means a state without democratic institutions isn't necessarily authoritarian, since it is not moving away from them, they just don't exist within it. Also under this definition the US isn't authoritarian, since it is not based upon the rule of a party, but two parties.

Authoritarianism, in politics and government, the blind submission to authority and the repression of individual freedom of thought and action. Authoritarian regimes are systems of government that have no established mechanism for the transfer of executive power and do not afford their citizens civil liberties or political rights. Power is concentrated in the hands of a single leader or a small elite, whose decisions are taken without regard for the will of the people. The term authoritarianism is often used to denote any form of government that is not democratic, but studies have demonstrated that there is a great deal of variation in authoritarian rule.

-Britannica
"Submission to authority" will appear in the next (and last) source as well. What does it mean? No clue, they don't define it.

Pretty based of Britannica to support the DPRK though - considering the DPRK does

Have a system for the transfer of executive power
Does afford it's citizens political rights and civil liberties. (Without getting into all the propaganda about North Korea, even within the western liberals propaganda apparatus it cannot be denied that the DPRK does afford it's citizens *some rights and liberties. How many and to what extent and which ones specifically? Doesn't matter)

Power is concentrated in the hands of a single leader or a small elite, whose decisions are taken without regard for the will of the people.

Okay so every government with a parliamentary system and a low approval rating then?

The term authoritarianism is often used to denote any form of government that is not democratic, but studies have demonstrated that there is a great deal of variation in authoritarian rule.

I wonder why there is such a variation? Could it be because the concept is flawed? No! It must be because us-foreign-policy

Authoritarianism: The belief that people must obey completely and not be allowed freedom to act as they wish

-Cambridge dictionary
Apparently it's just... A belief system and not actually about how a state enforces itself? Doesn't this make every "vote blue no matter who!" lib an authoritarian? Abolish bedtimes I guess, since that is a belief children should obey the authority of their parents. Abolish homework as well.

Authoritarianism: of, relating to, or favoring blind submission to authority [OR] of, relating to, or favoring a concentration of power in a leader or an elite not constitutionally responsible to the people

-Merriam-Webster
The second definition is perhaps the best one available, though it is kind of yank-brained. The UK doesn't have a constitution. It is authoritarian, yes, but not because of a lack of a legal document. It also decries the concentration of power, so that would be every centralised state apparatus.
And what does "constitutionally representative to the people" even mean? Does this not also require the constitution continually is changed as the will of the people changes? I agree that would be a good thing, but that would mean most governments are authoritarian, considering how many have constitutions with bits that leave them excempt from responsibility to "the people".
Finally this definition doesn't actually care about what the government does, just that it is not constitutionally beholden to "the will of the people

[+] Kangae_Hishiryo@scribe.disroot.org -5 points 3 hours ago (18 children)

[removed by mod]

[–] Kangae_Hishiryo@scribe.disroot.org -4 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

About "submission to authority", it talks by itself: you have to think what the president or leader thinks, to want what they wat and to hate what they hate, and if you dissent even just a bare minimum, you'll be paid with physical, mental and social violence.

[–] ShimmeringKoi@hexbear.net 8 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

With all due respect, this is baby's first anticommunist propaganda and we've all debunked these claims four million times.

[–] Kangae_Hishiryo@scribe.disroot.org -4 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Well, give me the studies, arguments and independent periodistic reports that are clearly not subject to interests conflicts.

Because I have them.

Again, you all are being, blind,bManichean and naive by basically cherry-picking and looking to another side when there's information that doesn't support your beliefs, just to attack the US (that, let's accept it, it's as authoritarian as China, but in a very different way).

Again, I hate both equally, and for me would be better if both Trump and Xi Jing Ping died.

[–] ShimmeringKoi@hexbear.net 10 points 2 hours ago

Well, give me the studies, arguments and independent periodistic reports that are clearly not subject to interests conflicts.

Because I have them.

Lol no you don't, everything you think you know about anticapitalist societies has been told to you by capitalist societies. Might as well ask the Tsar what he thinks about the commoners (fun fact, the colonialist powers that gave you your indoctrination invaded Russia during the revolution to fight alongside the Tsar against the commoners).

Again, you all are being, blind,bManichean and naive by basically cherry-picking and looking to another side when there's information that doesn't support your beliefs

Are you just stringing together reddit words? Neither of us has presented anything yet, how can we be "cherrypicking" things that haven't been presented. Are you in some kind of fugue state? All that's happened is that you've stumbled in here like a drunk in a museum and vomited your terribly weak propaganda all over the displays.

load more comments (16 replies)

load more comments (23 replies)