this post was submitted on 24 May 2026
605 points (97.6% liked)

Technology

84923 readers
3475 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The reason the FCC is only allowing the sale of state approved routers in the US?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] RegularJoe@lemmy.world 116 points 1 day ago (3 children)

"This technology turns every router into a potential means for surveillance," warns Julian Todt from KASTEL. "If you regularly pass by a café that operates a WiFi network, you could be identified there without noticing it and be recognized later -- for example by public authorities or companies."

Later...

Inexpensive or older routers either don’t store history at all or keep it for a short time.

Newer models can store more information for more extended periods.

https://www.thetechwire.com/how-long-does-a-router-store-history/

[–] morto@piefed.social 68 points 1 day ago (1 children)

We used to recommend people to run the newest stuff possible, but we came to a point that maybe it's better for us to keep with older tech for a good while

[–] mecen@lemmy.ca 7 points 17 hours ago

Or go to more civilized countries for vacation to get not backdoored hardware.

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

From what I've just read, the tech doesn't seem ready to identify people yet. It can supposedly detect hand gestures, but facial recognition I seriously doubt. But that's probably just a matter of improving the tech. See this article for more info.

[–] nulluser@lemmy.world 7 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

From OPs linked article...

In tests involving 197 participants, the researchers said the system identified individuals with nearly 100% accuracy. The recognition remained effective regardless of viewing angle or how the participants walked.

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

I can totally believe when it tracks a person it can tell when the same person walks by again later. But matching people with their actual identities would require a database of wifi scan data that simply doesn't exist yet.

[–] obviouspornalt@fedinsfw.app 4 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

that's a trivial problem to solve. combine this with a camera for facial recognition in a public space. then you've got wifi signature combined with the photo/video for facial recognition. then presumably you can use the WiFi signature anywhere else, even without the camera and be able to identify people.

[–] Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

I was wondering about that. The article didn't say anything about being able to identify the same person walking past a different router. And I can't imagine the study didn't try. So I assume it doesn't work.

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 5 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

That's connection history. CSI motion detection software storing information it collects would be entirely independent of that. How much it saves and for how long would depend on the size of the router's memory.