this post was submitted on 28 May 2026
280 points (99.0% liked)

Fuck AI

7069 readers
1541 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
VerbFlow@lemmy.world
MrMcGasion@lemmy.world
TootSweet@lemmy.world
BigMikeInAustin@lemmy.world
cynar@lemmy.world
drmeanfeel@lemmy.world
pavnilschanda@lemmy.world
CriticalMedicine@lemmy.world
WonderfulWanderer@lemmy.world
Communist@lemmy.ml
eatCasserole@lemmy.world
SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
NutWrench@lemmy.world
Soup@lemmy.cafe
iAvicenna@lemmy.world
Tinks@lemmy.world
wizblizz@lemmy.world
corus_kt@lemmy.world
TrickDacy@lemmy.world
andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works
MeDuViNoX@sh.itjust.works
33550336@lemmy.world
Nougat@fedia.io
Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
Quill7513@slrpnk.net
glowing_hans@sopuli.xyz
e8d79@discuss.tchncs.de
ThefuzzyFurryComrade@pawb.social
280
Nvidia VP Admits AI Costs More Than The Employees (youtu.be)
submitted 1 day ago by babysmokesalot@sh.itjust.works to c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world
23 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Companies told us AI would replace human workers and cut costs. Turns out the math doesn’t work. An Nvidia VP just confirmed that compute costs for his team exceed what they pay their employees. Uber burned through its entire 2026 AI budget in four months. And a startup CEO ran up a $113,000 monthly AI bill, with a four-person team.

This episode breaks down exactly why AI is costing companies more than the humans they laid off, what “tokenmaxxing” is and why engineers are doing it, and whether any of this spending is actually returning anything. Because at some point the ROI question stops being awkward and starts being a board-level emergency.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sundray@lemmus.org 3 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

As an NVIDIA VP I assume he's rich enough to casually walk away from the mess while tossing a lit match over his shoulder.

[–] flying_sheep@lemmy.ml 0 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

Nvidia isn't actually losing money, they're selling GPUs to the companies that sell the compute back to them, so the effective outcome is still profit for Nvidia. They seem smart enough to have a down ramp from all this.

[–] pachrist@lemmy.world 3 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Nah, if there's anything I've learned, it's that 99% of people/companies/businesses follow the "if I made money yesterday, and I made money today, I'll make money forever" rule. Greed is fundamentally short-sighted.

[–] flying_sheep@lemmy.ml 2 points 18 hours ago

Sure, especially when they let shareholders have a say, who don't care about the long-term viability of a company, just short-term profits. They can always sell.

Yet Nvidia isn't doing things like that as egregiously. The other tech giants fire, they hire.