585
Majority of Android users aren't sold on Gemini Intelligence, survey reveals
(www.androidauthority.com)
this post was submitted on 28 May 2026
585 points (99.2% liked)
Technology
85001 readers
3606 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Lmk when AI can clean my house and do my dishes.
Then i might be interested, maybe.
I'd rather sit and play guitar while AI does the dishes than do dishes while AI generates music.
I totally agree with you, but that problem is way harder to solve than LLMs and music generation.
We got LLMs and music/image generators first because there's so much written information, music recordings, and images to train models on. There's practically zero data about how your body moves when you're washing dishes and what it looks like in the sink, what a dirty plate looks like or a clean one, so we can't just train robots to do it yet except in extremely specified environments with as few variables as possible.
There's a lot of advancement in this area, trying to solve these problems. Robotics is a very exciting field of advancement these days. Automated dish cleaning machines exist that don't use AI, but they're industrial and expensive. If you want something that uses dawn, a sponge, elbow grease, and your particular style and height and form factor of kitchen sink, we need a lot of data about people washing dishes to train models on.
At least, at this point we do. We will probably get to a point where an AI enabled robot can learn new manual tasks, but think about how long it took YOU, a human, to develop and learn motor function and coordination. All that motor telemetry data, input sounds, sights, and tactile sensations are handled by your brain silently, and we take it all for granted. But it's all built off a lifetime of your brain taking input data and processing it so you can run the biomechanical series of squishy meat levers and pulleys to wash the dishes.
I'll head this off at the start: The comparison is already extremely skewed. There's no hard "right" or "wrong" with creating text or images. Fuck up a sentence? Eh, whatever. Miss a note? Call it Jazz. Extra finger? ...okay, maybe there is a "wrong" but it's not a costly mistake.
Generate a dish-cleaning procedure that ends up trying to place down the cup where it is typically placed down, except the randomly deviating space is now partially occupied by a plate also placed within typical deviation of where plates typically are? Cup tips, falls, crashes and now the floor has irregularities not accounted for in the original procedure generation. Do I abort, try to generate a new procedure or carry out a floor-cleaning routine? How do I identify which option to go for, assuming I detect the irregularities at all?
The pattern-generation/-imitation approach used in GenAI is ill-equipped for systems requiring strict conditions and semantic requirements attached to parts of the pattern, for the same reason we've had incidents of agentic GenAI breaking production systems and their general tendency to produce shitty code that needs human supervision: There is no meaning to the tokens. That's good and well when you can kimit permissions and double-check before applying their suggested changes, but it works poorly with physical tasks.
Which is why
They're the physical equivalent of specialist systems, built for a specific task and very good at it, better than humans even. I would hope they'll become more affordable at smaller scales, but I think the current hype about universal systems isn't gonna deliver the results we're hoping for. Humans are sorta good at many things, but I think imitating them shouldn't be aiming for imitating sorta good utility.
I'd love to see the development of human-like machines be treated and funded as a fancy toy, maybe a platform to explore the nature of sentience and sapience, a vehicle for science. I don't need them to have practical applications any more than I need other research to start out with a practical application: maybe an actual use will emerge down the line, maybe the lessons learned will contribute to other research, who knows. Just let the nerds go wild with the nerdery and keep business out of it.
The universal household robot would probably be a natural language interface for a dispatching system instructing and coordinating specialists. And if manually placing my dishes in a receptacle or sorting my laundry is all I have to do, I'll be happy.
Oh or finally drives a car! I was promised that 10 years ago.