72
The largest study of AI use by undergrads is in, revealing disparities in access — and in cheating
(www.universityofcalifornia.edu)
this post was submitted on 29 May 2026
72 points (98.6% liked)
Technology
84984 readers
3748 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Nah, these are Gen A studies and pre school. But it's giving insight into tailend Z. Also giving insight to older generations failing in attention-span and critical thought/attention. Like self-induced cognitive stagnation. Oversaturation of mental disorder diagnosis due to their broadening grey area, but sleep deprivation, favouring dopamine over the other "happy" releases. Especially in males that have less biological releases of oxytocin.
Ugh, that didn't even make sense to me reading it back. I'll try find a public breakdown of one but it means I gotta... deeo hreath... search engine "scientific sources"...
Edit: Nope. Clickticles of opinionated bullshit and one public paper that's had 138 citations in under a year. Which would be great if academia worked that well in its sharing of knowledge, but it's suspiciously too many.
My dude.
I'm talking about the long-term effects of AI on Gen B.
As in members of future generations who will eventually spend their entire lives cognitively surrendered to AI, not just a portion of their later life.
Absent a time machine, there literally cannot be studies on that yet.
Oh, so like extra fucked than currently? Yeah, that makes sense and lines up with what's currently being observed now—with scientific model, no less.
Here's the best part; climate change is only just now scratching its way in years and years after it was identified as inevitable.
Good times ahead.