this post was submitted on 27 May 2026
370 points (97.7% liked)

Fuck AI

7069 readers
651 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Wildly disrespectful to any artist that ever lived. I'm all up for sharing alternatives that are good/better towards actual artists. Still evaluating my choices, but meanwhile this seems like the only and rather easy signal the streaming community can give as to spread the word if they agree (next to stopping your own subscription). Context: https://techcrunch.com/2026/05/22/spotifys-ai-bet-more-of-everything-less-of-what-you-want/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bss03@infosec.pub 0 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

All of my musician friends (3) do all their paid music creation live, and aren't on Spotify. So, they couldn't tell me their motivation for being on Spotify is; none of them have ever complained about piracy.

That's not the evidence I asked for, those are canned statement from Spotify. Do you believe everything Spotify says? They have misled people about their motives before.

Still, thanks for an least engaging with the premise.

[–] HarneyToker@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

Ratio. They don’t sound like very successful artists lmao

I wonder why they wouldn’t be on Spotify if it’s so good for artists? 🤔

Please explain what you mean by “canned statement” exactly? Is a factual statement not relevant if it comes from someone you don’t like?

[–] bss03@infosec.pub 1 points 17 hours ago

By "canned" I mean "made palatable for the masses and packaged compactly".

Those statements aren't evidence any more than your claims are. For evidence, we would need some measurements of reality.

Spotify wouldn't be the first company to claim "piracy" as their motivation even tho their actions leave the rate of piracy virtually unchanged, so I do doubt their motivational claims. But, it's also not what I asked for. I want to see if there was an actual observable effect on piracy that has anything to do with Spotify.