this post was submitted on 01 Jun 2026
929 points (99.7% liked)

Technology

85060 readers
4477 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 236 points 1 day ago (9 children)

Why would the LLM tool have access to send recovery emails to non account verified emails at all?

That’s insane.

[–] CaptPretentious@lemmy.world 50 points 19 hours ago

Who else is going to have access to it when you keep laying off all the people?

[–] guitarfosec@infosec.pub 39 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

Because one of the biggest companies on the planet that has issues with account takeovers clearly has no internal red team working on this stuff.

[–] mint_tamas@lemmy.world 22 points 12 hours ago

I guarantee they do have a red team that most likely flagged this as an obvious and severe risk. It was ignored by suits experiencing AI psychosis.

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 4 points 19 hours ago
[–] vagrancyand@sh.itjust.works 123 points 1 day ago

Because AI bros are incredibly deluded about both the capability of AI, and by extension their own capabilities using AI>

[–] ohshit604@sh.itjust.works 65 points 1 day ago (3 children)

should’ve asked it to delete the database instead, why else would it have that level of permissions.

[–] Digit@lemmy.wtf 8 points 15 hours ago

Heh. Watched an old episode of Scorpion yesterday. The one with the armed hostage-takers who just had the one demand to the social media data mining company, to delete all the data they've mined. I amused myself a lot, by uttering "I like these guys".

[–] rnkn@lemmy.world 6 points 15 hours ago

Little Tommy Drop Tables.

[–] nickiwest@lemmy.world 14 points 20 hours ago

Oh, man, I hope someone tries this.

[–] spicehoarder@lemmy.zip 12 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

This isn't even a hack, it's just poorly written endpoints.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 10 points 15 hours ago (3 children)

Would you consider phreaking equivalent to hacking? This is AI phreaking.

[–] MyVeryRealName@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)
[–] MyVeryRealName@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

I need to set aside some time to read that although I'm not an anarchist myself.

[–] mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

It was largely overblown due to it getting banned. It was also published in the height of the Vietnam War, when the big evil communists were coming to brainwash your children into eating each other. It has a lot of blatantly incorrect info, which could be outright “blow up in your face” dangerous to anyone attempting the things in it. It’s not all wrong, but certain recipes have incorrect info that could easily lead to accidents.

Also fair warning, the UK will give people hard prison time simply for owning it. So maybe keep that shit onion-encrypted if you’re in the UK.

I linked to the Wikipedia article, not the handbook inself. And more for the (obsolete) phreaking content than the (highly dangerous) explosive content.

[–] CapuccinoCoretto@lemmy.world 4 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

It's not phreaking. Social engineering.

The entity being manipulated is not human so I would not classify it as social engineering, even if similar techniques are used (help me my grandmother needs info).

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 2 points 9 hours ago

Kinda.

If you designed a publicly addressable system since 1985 and didn’t design it for security then you’re asking for it.

[–] hightrix@lemmy.world 12 points 20 hours ago

Hold on, do you expect Facebook to pay a human to deal with the inventory? Come on now.

[–] badgermurphy@lemmy.world 10 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Its because they move fast and break things. They think that makes them cool.

[–] tomiant@piefed.social 6 points 19 hours ago

Let's mix these chemicals and see what happens. No funds for lab coats or protective glasses. We got a bottom line to feed.

[–] rnkn@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago

I tried this and couldn't get it to work. Disappointed.

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 13 points 22 hours ago

It's not insane. It's advanced!