this post was submitted on 03 Jun 2026
964 points (99.7% liked)

People Twitter

10414 readers
419 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major celebrity, figure or any politician. See stickied post https://web.archive.org/save is an option. Archive.is is no longer recommended because they remove/alter content.
  7. If a tweet (or similar) makes a statement of fact, either mark it as "satire" in the body or provide the original source link backing up the statement (see rule 6)

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
964
Managers (media.piefed.zip)
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by inari@piefed.zip to c/whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] zloubida@sh.itjust.works 16 points 3 months ago (3 children)

I'm not a developer and I don't know a thing about the capabilities of LLMs so this may explain that, but I'm quite surprised that open weight LLMs could actually match Claude.

[–] theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 27 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yes, the big proprietary cloud models have an edge, but it is narrow and the open-weight models are constantly closing the gap. There is no moat when it comes to AI models and no company has yet discovered some secret special sauce to improve their model significantly over others.

Running the latest and greatest open-weight GLM, Kimi, or Qwen model is basically equivalent to running the previous latest and greatest version of Claude. So if you were happy with Claude then, you'll basically be happy with an open-weight model now.

[–] Bluescluestoothpaste@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Well it's the speed and processing power, i dont believe you can get anywhere close to cloud claude performance on any standard desktop

[–] theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Surprisingly, yes you absolutely can with Qwen3.6 35b. Also, a business would be putting together a dedicated interference server to serve many users, not any standard desktop.

[–] Bluescluestoothpaste@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I see, but im guessing that OP dumbass literally wants to run llm on their laptops lol

[–] Xanvial@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

Match current Claude is not, but Claude 6-12 months ago should be possible using Open model

[–] MalReynolds@slrpnk.net 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Mostly down to frameworks (the bits around the LLM like RAG, memory, prompts, agents etc.) now. The ability to just throw more tokens at the problem is also super important. And you can because you're just paying for electricity (and CapEx for the hardware), not tokens from companies that are doing pre-IPO monetization (i.e. tokens gonna go up, way up). They've been losing money hand over fist to gain market share and pump the idea, that was never going to last.