this post was submitted on 03 Jun 2026
771 points (97.2% liked)

Technology

85142 readers
5084 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
771
Women in Brussels 'filmed without their knowledge' by men wearing Meta smart glasses (www.brusselstimes.com)
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by arsCynic@piefed.social to c/technology@lemmy.world
284 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

“Experts in Europe warn that these devices are used to record strangers without their consent, possibly breaching EU law.”

“A small LED light is designed to indicate when recording is taking place, but RTBF's investigators found that tutorials explaining how to conceal the indicator are abundant and easily accessible online.”

Sometimes I have a hard time deciding who I despise more, parasite Mark Zuckerberg or its witless hosts who keep using its products—yes, Zuck's pronoun is it. Ban Ray-Ban, for frick's sake.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz -2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Years ago I tried calling out the normalization of anybody recording anybody in public without their knowledge or consent, and nobody cared because I was a man so they thought I didn't deserve privacy. Now the headlines frame it as a women's issue and suddenly everyone cares.

It's not a gendered thing. It's a privacy issue. People didn't care when I raised concerns about it, and I'm not surprised that it's biting people on the ass.

I still think it's wrong, I just don't find it surprising given people's reactions whenever I raised concerns about it.

Also, ray-ban was stupid for allowing this because obviously nobody is going to buy their shit anymore. They had a distinctive design that now nobody is going to trust...

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I can tell you the vast majority of people don't care AND Raybans gets their name in the media more often so it's marketing for them.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's putting a lot of weight in the "all publicity is good publicity" assumption

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 1 points 10 hours ago

When nobody gives a fuck, it unfortunately holds true.

[–] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

They've made crap sunglasses for a while now. I went to another company for my Aviators.

[–] gramie@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

I hate to tell you, but whatever the other company you went to is, it's almost certainly Luxottica, the same people who make Ray-Ban now.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 0 points 1 day ago

I never said I liked raybans, but for a while over a decade ago they were all the rage with the hipster/indie crowd. People liked them, and their style was distinctive. So distinctive that even a cheap knockoff were called "raybans" for the shape of the frame and lenses.

Now no one in their right mind besides annoying tech bros are going to wear raybans, because anyone who sees them is going to assume they have cameras with facial recognition linked to meta's servers.