this post was submitted on 03 Jun 2026
964 points (99.7% liked)

People Twitter

10414 readers
364 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major celebrity, figure or any politician. See stickied post https://web.archive.org/save is an option. Archive.is is no longer recommended because they remove/alter content.
  7. If a tweet (or similar) makes a statement of fact, either mark it as "satire" in the body or provide the original source link backing up the statement (see rule 6)

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
SendMeYourTaTas@sh.itjust.works
pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
964
Managers (media.piefed.zip)
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by inari@piefed.zip to c/whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works
180 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

"I don’t think any of that is true. show me data" is shown data "I won't accept that data!" Lol. Lmao even.

Yeah, I'm not going to play this game of trying to anticipate which numbers you're willing to accept and which you aren't. You have just as equal access to a search engine as I have. All of the results I have seen align with the numbers that Qwen released and are well within margins of error.

This model's release caused such a stir and was a big deal due to the fact that it reproducibly meets or beats Claude Opus 4.5 while being locally runnable. If you won't believe it, okay, I don't care. 🤷