this post was submitted on 04 Jun 2026
197 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

85142 readers
5147 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In May 2025, the Texas App Store Accountability Act made it mandatory for companies like Apple and Google to verify the ages of their Texas-based users. As the law is set to be enforced starting Thursday, Apple has outlined an update to its App Store rules.

On the Apple Developer website, the company explained that new Apple Accounts in Texas will be subject to "age assurance and parent or guardian consent on behalf of minors under the age of 18 for downloads, Apple In-App Purchases, and significant changes associated with an app."

In practice, this means that anyone who wants to create an Apple Account in Texas must verify that they are 18 or older. Those under 18 will need to join a Family Sharing group, and parents will be able to revoke access to previously approved App Store apps.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ulkesh@piefed.social 38 points 23 hours ago (3 children)

Is there any actual purpose, for the consumer, that this serves? These governments are full of literal idiots.

[–] BranBucket@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

Some people who are utterly tech ignorant and unwilling to actively parent their children might feel better about handing their kid a device so they don't have to deal with them.

However, this is primarily the end game of both targeted advertising and those who want wholesale surveillance of the population (who are often the same people). Tying the whole of your online presence to your unique offline identity.

[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 8 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Oh they aren't idiots, they know exactly what they are doing, the bidding of some factions that likely supplied them with model legislation through ALEC for this.

They want to connect every person to every account, and record everything everyone does or says or looks at, to run through their half baked ai threat detection models and create secret social scores to be used secretly against us from business to government, to the prices we are charged for items, to that job, that loan, and the like.

[–] ulkesh@piefed.social 3 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

One can be an idiot and still think they know they're doing.

However, you're likely right. They're less idiotic and more malicious and nefarious. We're back in the mode of "let's use every possible method to try to control people." What these assholes don't realize is that eventually the people will rise up again and simply murder them. The rich have this coming as well. It's only a matter of time and how much the masses are willing to put up with before the dam blows.

[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 hours ago

You are right as well, they are idiots, in multiple ways. Their actions may be based on a nihlism where they believe in nothing other than self interest, cynical to the core. But many believe a lot more of their own bullshit than someone like me previously thought.

Covid really drove that point home. They are dumber than we give many of them credit for. Look at MTG, she actually believed the bs. To her credit, she rejected it when she learned. But she didn't already know? We all knew. WTF. The alternative realities we are living under is just incredible.

[–] Prove_your_argument@piefed.social 70 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Advertisers REALLY want to know what age groups are into what.

Oh, and uploading your ID or whatever to do this guarantees they know who posted those pesky comments that do not align with the party values.

"We're protecting the children" per usual

[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 7 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

This isn't about advertisers although they may be a bit player, this is about silicon valley, the technofascists, the national security dickheads, databrokers, and the like.

This is so much worse than advertising. This is connected to those data centers, brah.

[–] Prove_your_argument@piefed.social 5 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

The technofacists are the advertisers man. All that data is what fuels ads, surveillance and all the rest. They built the platforms and the intelligence capabilities. Whoever has the most data drives the most effective ads, surveillance pricing, targeted promotions, etc.

If they didn't start off early on using the data for advertisement, they wouldn't have continued their journey to use the same data for big brother tech. There's a ton of extra steps and things along the way, but at some point once a company starts making billions of dollars they all get into politics and lobbying (we really need to call lobbying political bribes.) They're just taking things a few more steps further nowadays. They are ALL complicit with what is going on.

[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 4 points 9 hours ago

Advertisers are their excuse, they are a user, not the primary one. This is about complete collection of data, fed into half baked ai threat detection, with firms like palantir making secret social scores to be secretly used against us in everything from business to government.

This is being spearheaded by the technofascists and others for that purpose, not advertising although they are in on it I'm sure.

[–] KingKong33@lemmy.ml 0 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Neither of those are the consumer.

[–] Prove_your_argument@piefed.social 1 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

Oh, serving you more relevant ads based on who you are so you purchase products isn't about you? :P

Okay, here's a stupid realistic answer: It might help stop kids from making purchases on adults phones without the actual adult.

But that's not a good answer even if it may be a side effect, because they aren't doing it to help us, they're doing it to own us. We rent our time here and have to work for it. They were born to never have to do anything but take our money, time, lifeblood, sanity, leisure, resources and potential. Simple really.