this post was submitted on 03 Jun 2026
771 points (97.2% liked)

Technology

85142 readers
5278 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

“Experts in Europe warn that these devices are used to record strangers without their consent, possibly breaching EU law.”

“A small LED light is designed to indicate when recording is taking place, but RTBF's investigators found that tutorials explaining how to conceal the indicator are abundant and easily accessible online.”

Sometimes I have a hard time deciding who I despise more, parasite Mark Zuckerberg or its witless hosts who keep using its products—yes, Zuck's pronoun is it. Ban Ray-Ban, for frick's sake.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Godric@lemmy.world 1 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

Except the camera outside every shop and on every streetcorner, yeah!

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 5 points 10 hours ago

Those aren't looking up her skirt, down her shirt, at your crotch or seeing your plumber's crack, just for that purpose.

[–] FLP22012005@lemmy.world 9 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

Yes, and many of those are illegal as well. Many home cameras (as part of video doorbells) are pointed at public streets, and they are usually illegal as well.

See for example: https://www.autoriteitpersoonsgegevens.nl/en/themes/camera-surveillance/camera-surveillance-at-organisations/rules-for-camera-surveillance-for-organisations

[–] TrippyHippy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 8 hours ago

How about dash cams?

[–] snugglesthefalse@sh.itjust.works 2 points 17 hours ago

Most countries don't have laws against recording public areas though, and generally as long as it's not for commercial use even the ones that do haven't set a precedent against it. The problem is when people are being recorded in compromising situations and in those cases it's usually illegal.

[–] codapine@lemmy.zip 4 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

I see what you're driving at, but CCTV cameras are recording 24/7 on the offchance that the footage is needed, just in case, by a body who is often regulated and monitored. Whereas the concern with the glasses is that they are operated by an otherwise anonymous individual and the recording is more likely to be targeted rather than a broadly cast net.

The very reason the first camera phones had to be re-engineered to add mandatory shutter sounds to them.

[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 3 points 13 hours ago

I think the mandatory shutter sound is a Japan-only thing.

[–] Tiger666@lemmy.ca -3 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

The very reason the first camera phones had to be re-engineered to add mandatory shutter sounds to them.

What?!?

Think about what you are saying for the love of all existence.

Volume buttons have always existed on cell phones. Your statement makes no sense.

Have a good day.

[–] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 4 points 13 hours ago

Cell phones in Japan must have an audible shutter sound. Pretty sure turning down the volume isn't enough to silence it.