this post was submitted on 02 Jun 2026
108 points (99.1% liked)

Canada

12059 readers
542 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 Sports

Baseball

Basketball

Curling

Hockey

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

NDP leader introduces bill that would require floor crossers to face voters first

https://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/article/ndp-leader-introduces-bill-that-would-require-floor-crossers-to-face-voters-first/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] GodofLies@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

How about we get rid of political parties and ban them from identifying themselves as 'X party' to begin with, huh? After all, political parties aren't even supposed to be part of the system. At the same time, ban these political parties from funding specific member campaigns. At the heart of it is how these MP's are backed by these so-called parties - which enables these parties to 'whip votes'. It all functions like a mafia group right now. Money is the reason why these political parties exist, but it also keeps out those that deserve/want to serve Canadians out due to the lack of funding because of ideological purity tests of bullshit.

Would it be a mess? Of course, at the start. But maybe a new system would emerge that would actually represent each constituents better rather than being held by a ideological gun-point via party funding.

We desperately need voting and government reform.

[–] CanIFishHere@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Considering our first PM was a conservative, how do you figure political parties weren't supposed to be part of the system? Also, it's very anti free society to restrict freedom of association.

[–] GodofLies@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago

Good point. This is why I pointed out how the system is actually working underneath. It's all about how the funding and money is flowing in this so called party system. It's by association and purity tests. It's not really by "you got in because you have actual good ideas for the greater good of society and humanity". It's about "they/him/her scratched his back so now we scratch their backs".

Then this would lead to the result of - how do we get money influence out of politics? In a simple way of explaining, one way would to do it would be to publicly fund each nominee/contender/incumbent BUT make the funding equal, make the media coverage equal, etc. Have an unified standard of how these metrics are presented. Even their promises presented, measured and compared. These are just ideas, but it's not impossible to do these. I'm sure there's many ways we can to level the playing field to an extent where it's not always big money crushing everything.