this post was submitted on 06 Jun 2026
37 points (89.4% liked)

Fuck AI

7069 readers
2084 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
VerbFlow@lemmy.world
MrMcGasion@lemmy.world
TootSweet@lemmy.world
BigMikeInAustin@lemmy.world
cynar@lemmy.world
drmeanfeel@lemmy.world
pavnilschanda@lemmy.world
CriticalMedicine@lemmy.world
WonderfulWanderer@lemmy.world
Communist@lemmy.ml
eatCasserole@lemmy.world
SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
NutWrench@lemmy.world
Soup@lemmy.cafe
iAvicenna@lemmy.world
Tinks@lemmy.world
wizblizz@lemmy.world
corus_kt@lemmy.world
TrickDacy@lemmy.world
andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works
MeDuViNoX@sh.itjust.works
33550336@lemmy.world
Nougat@fedia.io
Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
Quill7513@slrpnk.net
glowing_hans@sopuli.xyz
e8d79@discuss.tchncs.de
ThefuzzyFurryComrade@pawb.social
37
What would it take to build AI ethically? (lemmy.world)
submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by ladybugs@lemmy.world to c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world
55 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

A lot of us here hate AI because of how it was built: training data gathered without the creators' explicit, opt-in consent, data centers that negatively affect communities' access to clean water and energy, a technology design that is inherently prone to hallucinations, etc. At least, those are the main reasons why I hate it.

I think I might actually want to support an AI project if I thought it was being done right. Maybe we could get more people away from exploitative models if there was a non-exploitative alternative.

So what would it take to build AI ethically, in your opinion? And do you know of anyone trying to build AI without these issues?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mushroommunk@lemmy.today 6 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I mean the energy usage in the face of global climate catastrophe is pretty unethical regardless of source of training material or what the LLM is used for

[–] Kirk@startrek.website 1 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Companies are the ones doing that.

[–] mushroommunk@lemmy.today 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Running an LLM inherently requires a large amount of energy. Whether locally run or in a large data center. Companies just make it happen on an insane scale.

[–] Kirk@startrek.website 0 points 2 days ago

Yes but the LLM is not the thing making the decision to do that on that scale. The people using it are.