Kirk

joined 1 year ago
[–] Kirk@startrek.website 6 points 2 weeks ago

Well except they're not asking poor people are they? They're asking everybody. And it's just an ask. If you don't want to accommodate the request then you don't have to, but going on the internet and publicly discouraging people from advocating for the needy just because they're wealthy is not helping anyone, especially the needy.

[–] Kirk@startrek.website 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yes exactly it's about their power to influence

[–] Kirk@startrek.website 8 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

There was a Ted Talk a while back (I can't remember who) where they said "I have always wanted to give a Ted Talk... what I realized I really wanted was to say I had given a Ted Talk". Meaning they want to be known as someone who had given a Ted Talk, not actually go through the process of writing and delivering the Talk.

People who write open source code do it because they like the process of writing, just like an author enjoys writing books. LLMs are for people who just want to be able to say they have written a book. People who slop-code aren't actually interested in learning how to code. Which is a fine toy for them to play with, but not sustainable (or reliable for others to use).

[–] Kirk@startrek.website 29 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

This is so true, I always think it's funny when they say AI will fix climate change, what's it going to do? Tell us to stop burning fossil fuels?

[–] Kirk@startrek.website 2 points 1 month ago

I've seen that but it's a weird vibe coded app and doesn't actually work

[–] Kirk@startrek.website 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

ShelfMark is the go-to option now. It's also far better than Readarr was and works seamlessly with both Prowlarr and Anna's Archive.

[–] Kirk@startrek.website 5 points 1 month ago

I think CWA is the most robust option out there. BookLore was vibecoded and behaved in the typical weird/unexpectedly way vibecoded apps tend to. I haven't tried the Fork of it, but CWA checks nearly all the boxes and is actively developed.

[–] Kirk@startrek.website 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I wish ABS synced progress between formats with KOReader!

[–] Kirk@startrek.website 4 points 1 month ago

IIRC those updates were a series of bugfixes after a major update, which seems to be how they prefer to work.

[–] Kirk@startrek.website 0 points 1 month ago

Huh? You distrust that the researchers distrust?

[–] Kirk@startrek.website 5 points 1 month ago

I definitely agree with that, I'm just saying I also saw no indication that the people running the project would disagree.

[–] Kirk@startrek.website 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The person I was replying to said the researchers misunderstood how the models work, but there's nothing in the report to indicate that is the case.

 

Another article for free (but seriously subscribe to 404 they do great work) https://futurism.com/artificial-intelligence/graduation-speaker-booed-ai

1012
Swoomp (startrek.website)
 
 

I know this isn't wallstreetbets but I can't help but wonder if this is a more secure investment than the usual S&P500.

 

Backstory here: https://www.404media.co/ars-technica-pulls-article-with-ai-fabricated-quotes-about-ai-generated-article/

Personally I think this is a good response. I hope they stay true to it in the future.

 

Inspired by a recent talk from Richard Stallman.

From Slashdot:

Speaking about AI, Stallman warned that "nowadays, people often use the term artificial intelligence for things that aren't intelligent at all..." He makes a point of calling large language models "generators" because "They generate text and they don't understand really what that text means." (And they also make mistakes "without batting a virtual eyelash. So you can't trust anything that they generate.") Stallman says "Every time you call them AI, you are endorsing the claim that they are intelligent and they're not. So let's let's refuse to do that."

Sometimes I think that even though we are in a "FuckAI" community, we're still helping the "AI" companies by tacitly agreeing that their LLMs and image generators are in fact "AI" when they're not. It's similar to how the people saying "AI will destroy humanity" give an outsized aura to LLMs that they don't deserve.

Personally I like the term "generators" and will make an effort to use it, but I'm curious to hear everyone else's thoughts.

view more: next ›