this post was submitted on 06 Jun 2026
374 points (97.9% liked)

Technology

85213 readers
4517 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 404found@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Microsoft doesn't have it in their DNA to get people addicted to AI. That part of their DNA mutated into a cancer a long time ago.

Microsoft meant be "addictive" in the sense of using Microsoft's AI to make a spreadsheet, type an email, make a PowerPoint etc.. Microsoft wants AI to access all your information to so its results are custom to the user and provide huge value.

This is where value and profit are a contradiction. How much profit is Microsoft willing to potentially throw away in an effort to provide an incredible AI user experience? Spoiler alert: not enough.

When was the last time you were blown away by a corporation because you had such a great experience and couldn't stop telling people about it? This is what Microsoft wants to happen with their AI but they haven't been capable of doing that with any of their products for decades ei Windows 10, 11, Bing...

[–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The last I thought "what a great product" from them was when I used winxp for the first time, and that was only because I came from 98se (which was just shy of the bane of humanity, whose title then belonged to win98). After a while using XP, I realized it was actually garbage, and that "good compared to" was not the measure I wanted for my os, and so began my search for a daily Linux. This was 20 years ago. They have decidedly not gotten better in those 20 years.

[–] Jason2357@lemmy.ca 2 points 8 hours ago

Indeed. I remember someone I respected raving that they had their new WinXP computer on for 2 weeks straight without it crashing and being blown away by the new advanced technology.

Teenage me didn't have any idea that would have been a low bar even in the 1980s.

[–] 404found@lemmy.zip 3 points 21 hours ago

It's been a long time since they have done anything well. Look at how much of a flop OneDrive was. They don't have the framework as a company to develop and train AI to be the way the leaked email wants it to be

[–] heartSagan5@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago

Man, surveillance loves snooping what AI is snooping.