this post was submitted on 08 Jun 2026
477 points (96.1% liked)

Selfhosted

60887 readers
1008 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Detailed Rules Post

  1. Be civil.

  2. No spam.

  3. Posts are to be related to self-hosting.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or readme if you're providing a link.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title.

  6. No trolling.

  7. Promotion posts require active participation, with an account that is at least 30 days old. F/LOSS without a paywall has exceptions, with requirements. See the rules link for details. Tags [CBH] or [AIP] are required, see the links in Rule 8 for details.

  8. AI-related discussions and AI-involved promotional posts have additional requirements for tagging, as noted in Rule 7 and the AI & Promotional Post Expanded Rules post, and find example disclosures here.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] fpslem@lemmy.world 115 points 1 month ago (13 children)

This article doesn't mention the limitations of remote access for Jellyfin, which requires some tricks like reverse proxy or Tailscale. I think Jellyfin is a great option if you only watch/listen on your home network, but if anyone wants to replicate the remote access capabilities of Plex, I typically warn them they are going to have to roll their sleeves up.

[–] TheIPW@lemmy.ml 42 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You're right, I missed that.

I personally use a reverse proxy and Wireguard setup to access remotely.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago (15 children)

Not something that unfortunately works as easily for me to connect my ailing mom's TV to, and do NOT want to manage the reverse proxy + cert + etc setup for a number of reasons

[–] matron1049@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 month ago (3 children)

There are a ton of reverse proxy options that manage the cert for you

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (12 children)

There's lots of reasons I don't want to set this up

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] PhAzE@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The point is that you now have another app to manage or learn about just for remote viewing, and the general public can't and won't manage something like that. People like us, no problem, its easy, but my dad would never be able to, for example. He can install plex and just log in to an app anywhere to use it though.

Also, dont forget that many households have non-static IP addresses, so now you need more management for that issue (again, easy for us).

[–] matron1049@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

In this scenario, your dad just installs Jellyfin and logs in.

You've set up the reverse proxy to your server, its transparent to him.

You can update DNS records automatically so its also a fire and forget kind of thing.

But I guess, give your data to the corpos because its easier.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Dultas@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Yeah it can be more limiting. Personally I got lucky and my mom's TV runs Android so I could just install a wireguard client.

I will probably at some point bridge her network with mine since I want to install a TrueNAS box at her house for remote backup. So the VPN client will be moot at that point.

[–] buffing_lecturer@leminal.space 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

How do you go about doing that?

[–] Dultas@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Which part? For the TV there was literally a wireguard app. I just had to install it on the TV and configure the connection to my wireguard server.

For the bridging I gave her my old router which I haven't tested but I believe should support VPN bridging. I already have her on a subnet that won't conflict with my network for that reason.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

How does Plex get around that? I've only ever used jellyfin.

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (11 children)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] skittle07crusher@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Tailscale truly could not be easier/simpler.

[–] hereiamagain@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 month ago

Not for all clients, like Roku for example.

Yes the solution is different hardware, like a Google TV, older firestick, raspAP, or flash openwrt on a router. But that's no longer plug and play and may have other caveats. Besides costing money.

No shade, it's just not QUITE that simple every time.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] lostbit@feddit.nl 7 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Don’t selfhost if you think a reverse proxy is tricky.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] szszl@szmer.info 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There are literaly zero limitations by Jellyfin to remotely access your media. You are free to access your instance in any way you want. Fuck plex

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] matron1049@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 month ago

A reverse proxy is a trick? That's like standard practice for web servers.

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 month ago

That's why I'm running both. I use jellyfin, everyone else uses Plex 🤣

[–] mundane@piefed.world 3 points 1 month ago (7 children)

Can't you just setup a dyndns and port forwarding?

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] jumponboard@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

If you can spin up a podman container, you can use a caddyfile. Hell, if you can nano and read, you can set uo a caddyfile.

[–] halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 3 points 1 month ago (5 children)

There is a third option, the program that Jellyfin was originally forked from back in 2018, Emby.

Sort of the middle child between the two. Nearly identically to Jellyfin for obvious reasons, several third party apps for Jellyfin work with it as well like Jellyseer, it has apps for nearly every device, and easy external connections via their servers like Plex does.

They do however have a premium subscription system like Plex to support things like those servers. It's not as expensive as Plex, even before the recent rate hike, but it is there and some stuff is locked behind that premium license.

[–] Mondez@lemdro.id 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So all the bad things of both, still a proprietary product that you can funnel your cotent through servers you don't control while simultaneously not being plex.

[–] klankin@piefed.ca 3 points 1 month ago (12 children)

But also benefits of both, reduced cost with easier remote setup, while simultaneously not being plex

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] WormFood@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

I can't recommend emby because their business practices are pretty scummy. After accepting open source contributions for years, they went closed-source in 2018 and took all those contributions with them (they had a CLA). The very next update, they added hardware acceleration and locked it behind a paywall. They had a pretty big 'security incident' a few years ago, which probably would have been averted if they were still open source, as users in the community flagged it as an issue long before the devs took action.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago

Honestly for video I agree, for audio, it's just me and only in my house or phone so tailscale is fine. If my friends really want audio, they can pay streaming for it.

load more comments (1 replies)