this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2026
1177 points (98.8% liked)

Flippanarchy

2564 readers
723 users here now

Flippant Anarchism. A lighter take on social criticism with the aim of agitation.

Post humorous takes on capitalism and the states which prop it up. Memes, shitposting, screenshots of humorous good takes, discussions making fun of some reactionary online, it all works.

This community is anarchist-flavored. Reactionary takes won't be tolerated.

Don't take yourselves too seriously. Serious posts go to !anarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Rules


  1. If you post images with text, endeavour to provide the alt-text

  2. If the image is a crosspost from an OP, Provide the source.

  3. Absolutely no right-wing jokes. This includes "Anarcho"-Capitalist concepts.

  4. Absolutely no redfash jokes. This includes anything that props up the capitalist ruling classes pretending to be communists.

  5. No bigotry whatsoever. See instance rules.

  6. This is an anarchist comm. You don't have to be an anarchist to post, but you should at least understand what anarchism actually is. We're not here to educate you.

  7. No shaming people for being anti-electoralism. This should be obvious from the above point but apparently we need to make it obvious to the turbolibs who can't control themselves. You have the rest of lemmy to moralize.


Join the matrix room for some real-time discussion.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It was definitely there with agriculture. Hunter gatherers had a lot of different ways of organizing their societies but early agrarian societies quickly developed a military caste and despotic governments.

[–] PolarKraken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Agriculture seems to me to be the point where humans first started saying "this stuff, that stays in one place and is useful, is actually just mine/ours". How that's done varies tremendously over time and space, but it's hard to imagine the concept of "ownership" in the way we now understand things, without agriculture. And it's easy (for me anyway) to imagine the idea of "property rights" springing pretty naturally out of beginning to understand cultivation.

And by that, I really do mean, we doomed ourselves to fight over the very things we fight about today, starting then lol.

[–] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah. When you’re breaking your back out in the fields all year and you’ve just barely managed to fill your granary with enough food for the winter, you’re not going to tolerate a band of marauders coming through and stealing all the food. Property was a matter of life and death for the entire village.

We’re all descended from these agrarian cultures (except for some of the indigenous folks who hail from hunter gatherer communities). These strong property rights are deeply rooted in our cultures.

[–] PolarKraken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago

Yep, couldn't agree more really, the ways we're built to think were useful and basically essential for all of human history.

But now things are very (eh, somewhat) different and we're doing a shit job of updating our understanding of "how to be people". Mostly (by my measure) due to the way our technology changes much much faster than human-scale "how to be" wisdom.

[–] BurgerBaron@quokk.au 1 points 1 week ago

I agree about hunter gatherers. I was coming at this from the perspective of when civilisation started "in a dank river valley near you" as Bill Wurtz put it with a few small huts beside the field owner's bigger stick figure hut :p