Flippanarchy
Flippant Anarchism. A lighter take on social criticism with the aim of agitation.
Post humorous takes on capitalism and the states which prop it up. Memes, shitposting, screenshots of humorous good takes, discussions making fun of some reactionary online, it all works.
This community is anarchist-flavored. Reactionary takes won't be tolerated.
Don't take yourselves too seriously. Serious posts go to !anarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Rules
-
If you post images with text, endeavour to provide the alt-text
-
If the image is a crosspost from an OP, Provide the source.
-
Absolutely no right-wing jokes. This includes "Anarcho"-Capitalist concepts.
-
Absolutely no redfash jokes. This includes anything that props up the capitalist ruling classes pretending to be communists.
-
No bigotry whatsoever. See instance rules.
-
This is an anarchist comm. You don't have to be an anarchist to post, but you should at least understand what anarchism actually is. We're not here to educate you.
-
No shaming people for being anti-electoralism. This should be obvious from the above point but apparently we need to make it obvious to the turbolibs who can't control themselves. You have the rest of lemmy to moralize.
Join the matrix room for some real-time discussion.
view the rest of the comments
I’ve got you tagged as “I like this person” for some reason.
... and you are now tagged as 'likes me for some reason', lol
And now I have you tagged as "liked by Rai" 😁
'possibly likes me because Rai likes me'
... surely this will not get out of hand and become immensely confusing at a later date
I had you tagged for 'quip of Theseus' that shit was 🌋
Do you have a link to that? That’s a fun tag name too hahaha
https://feddit.uk/post/50565569/25623984
Really good joke
Hahaha. I’ve got you at +26, but you must’ve written something specific at some point for me to go out of my way to tag you… most of my tags are horrid poo brown for unreasonable people/bad faith people/racist/sexist/etc.
I don't even know how to do the... thing where i run my own up vs downvotes on other people's accounts.
I mostly just shit post from mobile, lol.
It’s a setting someone told me about like a year ago! It lives in voyager, somewhere. I can find it if you’re interested! Alas, it only counts votes from when you turn it on. I like stats sometimes, so it’s fun to see random numbers on people.
A lot of times, when I see a big negative number like 20+, it makes total sense. Occasionally I see a negative number and it makes no sense.
I downvote image posts a lot if they’re really dumb-ly censored and it’s not purposeful to be cheeky, or if they taste really.. “Facebook-ey”? I think then I see whoever posts a lot of posts, and they’re making funny or insightful comments and I feel bad. I’m sorry, those people. I appreciate that you post, it keeps things alive. I should stop downvoting those posts… but I don’t like them.
Ah, well.
Well that would make sense as to why I have no idea how to enable it:
I don't use Voyager, that kind of feature literally doesn't exist in my client.
... Maybe I can figure out a way to enable some web version of it, at the instance level? Just occasionally run/update it from my PC, kinda like running a webscrape algo?
Not sure.
Presumably there is a repo somewhere I could clone and fork/fuck up to my own ends, lol.
But anyway... perhaps oddly, the way I use lemmy is more like ... I sometimes updoot, more often forget to.
Rarely just downvote something.
If I see a comment that is what I deem to be very incorrect or misguided, first, engage with that person in good faith.
If they either don't respond or respond, still maybe disagreeing, but also in good faith?
Fuck, I'll upvote that. That's the point of a discussion forum, imo.
But, if they reply in bad faith, or with just basically gibberish or insults, or are determined to be selectively illiterate, and they persist in this, I block em.
... I have a lot of people of my block list.
If there was some actual crowd based feedback mechanism that punished being an obstinate, inconsiderate ass... as opposed to punishing being broadly factually wrong or having an unpopular take... I think that would make for a much better discussion board type of environment.
So, untill that gets invented, I basically just try to do it for myself.
You want people to feel safe in potentially being simply wrong. How, otherwise, can anyone learn or grow or be conceptually challenged?