this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2026
510 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

85574 readers
4255 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
510
UK: Under-16s to be banned from social media, Starmer announces (www.bbc.co.uk)
submitted 5 days ago by Tarambor@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
310 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Under-16s will be banned from using social media, Prime Minister Keir Starmer has announced.

Starmer says social media is making children unhappy, making it easier for bullies to abuse children, and is "designed to be addictive". A ban would give children more time, security, and more freedom to grow up - as well as more opportunities, he adds.

"That is all any parent wants. They want to know that Britain will be better for their children, that they will get a fair chance," the PM says in a speech in Downing Street.

Starmer adds that the government is "not prepared to compromise" on the safety and happiness of children - and that includes in the regulation and enforcement of this ban. He says the government has listened to and learned from countries like Australia, where a similar ban has already been introduced.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 1 points 3 days ago (2 children)

What for?

[–] GoatSynagogue@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

As your username. Why don’t you use it?

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Because it would be boring?

[–] GoatSynagogue@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Not because you want to be anonymous? What’s your name? Address? Phone number?

That’s what the government want to be able to tell. They want to be able to arrest you because you said something they didn’t like, no matter where you say it on the internet.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

No, that's not it. If I wanted to be anonymous I would not use seflhosted instance tied to my personal domain, would I?

[–] GoatSynagogue@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

So what’s your name/address/phone number?

[–] pressanykeynow@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

We don't believe you otherwise.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 1 points 3 days ago

That's ok, I don't care if you believe me or not.