this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2026
92 points (97.9% liked)
Technology
85501 readers
4852 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Any Wallpaper Engine enthusiasts here that can educate me as to why it’s so popular?
Is it really that much better than just finding wallpapers with an image search like in the old days?
Wallpaper engine allows for animated/video wallpapers. When I used windows I had this cool neutron star wallpaper that would spin around
I thought those were a waste of resources when that kind of feature debuted with Windows Vista, but I'm the kind of guy who runs Xfce with animations turned off, so...
It's not images, it's 'live' animated wallpapers. Like on android. I use one of the built-in ones that acts as a... I can't think of the term, like a visualizer of what part on the sound spectrum is being played, but in circle form instead of just horizontal. When I'm not playing music, it acts as a pixel-style 'flying through space' like Win 9x screensavers.
I've tried others on the workshop, and they are fun to poke at, but I never keep them long. Rainmeter fits my needs so more basic wallpapers work for me.
Yes, it's much better for me. Animated, or even reactive wallpapers, have stepped up my desktop personalization so much, I don't really care to go back to boring still images.
All I can think to this kind of thing is: if you're spending so much time staring at the wallpaper, what's the rest of your computer for?
I personally try to leave as little of the wallpaper visible as possible, but I guess I'm the weird one.