this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2026
967 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

85698 readers
4946 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

fuck offffff

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world -2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Funny thing is I already thought of two angles that might make people willingly use that:

  1. Sex coaches review your recent experiences and give you advice (good or bad, just like other life advice fields).
  2. Proof of consent so neither party can change the story after the fact. Though the proof won't be at a scientific rigor level so it won't help as much as people will hope, though it probably will clear up some less complex cases and complicate the shit out of others.
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 2 points 23 hours ago

I don't think that audio only would be enough for #1 and for #2 oh god fucking no, that easily can and would be abused to hell and back and that would for sure slam the last nail in the coffin of basic human interaction. Yes, doh, rape bad, of course, but if you regulate the shit out of human behaviour we just stop being human beings anymore.

Sex is complicated, rape even more so. Anytime I see these "one easy fix" for these complicated issues I get very nervous, it's not how that works

[–] thethunderwolf@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

wtf??? doesnt make it any less extreme privacy violation

for 1: record it yourself consciously (if youre not comfortable with that then why are you comfortable with Google doing it)

for 2: there are other solutions, law enforcement isnt an excuse to violate privacy at all, the government is one of the major things we want privacy against

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

I didn't say it wasn't a privacy issue, just that those are two reasons that some would probably just accept that shit.

Just like most of us accept the spy devices we already use because they allow communication and internet access and only a tiny portion of people go out of their way to try to reduce that (though due to how cell phones work at all, you can't avoid the simple "this is where their phone was at this time" tracking, which might be "vicinity of cell tower" or "about right here" depending on whether any triangulation was involved).