this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2026
797 points (95.1% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

40503 readers
4581 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Honytawk@discuss.tchncs.de 60 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (6 children)

Everyone deserves to be treated exactly the way they treat others.

So be racist to racists. Throw homophobes on the street. Exploit the rich. And kill all Nazis.

And if they can't handle that, then that is on them. It is the most neutral view you can have of the world.

[–] exasperation@lemmy.dbzer0.com 29 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The law, in its majestic equality, forbids the rich and poor alike to sleep under bridges, to beg in the streets, and to steal bread.

A system of fair rules does not always lead to fair outcomes, if the rules don't accommodate the asymmetry in capacity, motivation, resources, etc.

[–] grepe@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

also, you cannot be tolerant to intolerant people. any system of beliefs like that is doomed. this is what is happening now.

[–] plyth@feddit.org 2 points 1 day ago

cannot be tolerant to intolerant

Unless you are in a secure position and have the means to help them overcome their insecurities.

[–] wpb@lemmy.world 21 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Blatant flaw in this: I don't want to murder anyone. I don't want to rape anyone. I don't want to be racist to anyone (though I acknowledge I am). And the moment I would do something like that to anyone, I would be a murderer or a rapist, and that's a shitty thing to be. So no thanks.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 days ago

It's just an endless line of good intentioned rapists.

[–] NekoKoneko@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

Yeah, also, I'd like my moral reasoning to have evolved past Hammurabi.

[–] ghen@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind.

[–] MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I understand what that is supposed to mean, but it makes no sense. I have never taken anybody's eyeball so if that was the law of the land, I would feel pretty safe. Eventually, everyone going around taking eyeballs would have no eyes and they would be much less likely to be able to take more, at least without some assistance I imagine.

Plenty of places have a "death for a death" law where if you kill someone you can be put to death. I'm against the death penalty personally, but that has never really been of personal concern to me since I don't go around murdering.

If you take something from someone, should they not be able to take it back from you? If you steal $1000, do I just have to sit there? I should be entitled to take $1000 back. If anything, I should also potentially be entitled to more.

While for an eye is not my preference, it was used to make people as whole as possible and was considered an improvement at the time.

[–] Ajen@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I understand what that is supposed to mean

It seems like your understanding is different from other people's.

[–] wpb@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I think they're taking it bit too literally

[–] plyth@feddit.org 2 points 2 days ago

An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind.

Exactly not. An eye for an eye ended the custom of escalating feuds. If only one eye can be taken in revenge, then all other eyes stay healthy.

It only continues if a taken eye is seen as unjust which leads to a chain of mutually unjustly taken eyes. But that's a slow process so the elders may figure something out while it happens.

[–] Folstar@lemmus.org 8 points 2 days ago (2 children)

"An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind." -Gandhi

[–] Honytawk@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

So should we just tolerate the intolerant? Cause that's going to end well. We'd still have half a planet with stabbed eyes while they go scot free.

[–] Folstar@lemmus.org 11 points 2 days ago

It turns out there are more than zero options between "do nothing" and "become what you hate". Many in fact.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago

It's a nice quote but doesn't really make sense. The eye for the second eye is the first eye, there's only two eyes involved, not a nonsensical endless chain of eyes. This concept of justice predates the quote.

[–] TheStaffmaster@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

There's a line in The Republic that states something to the effect of "You cannot persuade someone who doesn't want to listen" at that point firing their own venom back at them is justified.

[–] jamesrandysghost@lemmy.zip 10 points 2 days ago (2 children)
[–] BeardededSquidward@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I remember being told it makes more sense when you realize it's a part of the social contract. Breaching it prevents you from taking part in it.

[–] Honytawk@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Indeed. If one side breaks the contract, the other isn't bound by it anymore either.

[–] Honytawk@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The tolerance paradox does not exist. See BeardedSquidwards comment.

[–] jamesrandysghost@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago

I think you need to re-read the comment...

[–] wpb@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

I don't see it. How does a society tolerating the intolerant not enable them to be intolerant, even if you believe in social contract theory?

[–] blarghly@lemmy.world -2 points 2 days ago

Edgy 14 year old logic