this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2026
101 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

85672 readers
4844 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Archive link: https://archive.ph/NaK7K

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Miller@lemmy.world -1 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

It was a shorthand he used, he wrote it as a superscript, it must of been his own, it was useful in terms of statistics analysis. Don't worry too much about your ability to decipher things, from your mathematical explanation I imagine it's something you have had to carry all of your life.

[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 hour ago

It has been a LONG time since I did any real math and never took statistics, but wouldn't x^(-1) just be 1/(x)? I don't know if that equates to "everything that isn't x". I feel like there's a specific way to write that, but a negative exponent is not that, I don't think, but also I have no idea.

I looked it up. Looks like this stuff is maybe from set theory? Which I sooorrrrt of remember doing at some point?

My best guess is your professor either said something from this, or you misremembered, or I'm totally off base and I'm still curious.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Complement_(set_theory)

[–] nyan@lemmy.cafe 1 points 1 hour ago

We may also be separated by a common llanguage—"lecturer" isn't a word that's much used in Canada. I've only encountered it as a Briticism.