this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2026
309 points (98.7% liked)

Fuck AI

7560 readers
1697 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In March, a girl’s stepfather took his own life after cops discovered that he had used Grok to create 7,000 sexually explicit images using one photo taken when his stepdaughter was 11 years old, the amended complaint alleged.

Grok allowed the man to generate extreme images depicting incest and rape without flagging any harmful behavior, the complaint said. Seemingly, xAI’s child safety system only intervened after the man input a prompt for “gang rape.” That request sent a CyberTip to the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC), which alerted law enforcement to the AI CSAM.

Yet the harm was not stopped then, either. Despite mandatory reporting requirements to share information like a user’s IP address when CSAM is flagged, xAI repeatedly refused to help cops or NCMEC identify the user, the complaint alleged. For weeks, xAI allegedly “obstructed this investigation at every turn” and made it harder for “law enforcement efforts to locate, identify, and apprehend the perpetrator.”

Eventually, the stepfather was arrested after cops obtained a warrant to seize his devices. That’s when “a forensic review revealed approximately 7,000 AI-generated images and videos” depicting his stepdaughter, which were allegedly produced using Grok. Without Grok providing users with easy access to “undressing” capabilities, his family doubts he ever would have generated the harmful images, which he allegedly trafficked online in trade for “CSAM produced by other child sex predators.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

He was trading them, so it might be one image, reproduced 7000 times. Clearly that's not the case, but he probably made fewer images, and sold them multiple times.

[–] curbstickle@anarchist.nexus 12 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

No, he quite specifically made over 7000, using a single photo as the reference.

Edit: Just to mention this is a Jane Doe added to an existing suit, and the picture was from.when she was 11, she is in her 20s now. Some articles even describe the imagery to some degree (not recommended reading BTW, I'd like to kill those brain cells).

It was only reported by xAI after a very specific, graphic, and horrific image request was made, despite there having been thousands of others generated, they didnt share anything actionable despite multiple requests from the NCMEC and cops over the course of several months. He killed himself 2 days after his devices were searched.

He had traded many of the over 7000 images he generated to get even more from others.

She is one of 5 Jane Does involved in the lawsuit.