this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2026
1154 points (99.1% liked)

People Twitter

10401 readers
234 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major celebrity, figure or any politician. You can replace the addres of .x.com to xcancel.com in the address. https://web.archive.org/save is an option. Archive.is is no longer recommended because they remove/alter content.
  7. If a tweet (or similar) makes a statement of fact, either mark it as "satire" in the body or provide the original source link backing up the statement (see rule 6)

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] k_mania@lemmy.nz 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'm torn, is there a good bit in the first half or is it all a scam to guilt us into losing money and LIDL still comes out on top on average?

[–] ViatorOmnium@piefed.social 11 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

The outcome is neutral for LIDL they don't get the deposit money either way. If anything they would prefer you don't return the bottles at all, since it would avoid processing costs and depending on the distribution agreement they might even pocket part of the deposit.

[–] SalamiDommie@lemmus.org 2 points 2 months ago

This - the dirty secret of most rebates and coupons is that without them customers don't buy the product as much. But then for those who don't have the discount still but for the increased price.

THEN most charities offered are in affiliating with the offering corp. Meaning they get tax write offs and a portion of the donation through their offering. The donation is made in the business name, not yours.

If you don't return it or discount, they pocket it.