this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2026
773 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

86264 readers
3975 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://toast.ooo/post/12317935

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] melroy@kbin.melroy.org -5 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Recent models are quite good. Like gpt 5.6 sol. Even better than mythos 5.

[–] expr@programming.dev 10 points 2 days ago (2 children)

How is this a response to a comment about AGI?

LLMs are not currently, nor ever will be, anything remotely resembling AGI. AGI is still entirely within the realm of science fiction, like teleportation or time travel.

[–] melroy@kbin.melroy.org 1 points 1 day ago

That's true. I'm just saying the models do get better and are quite impressive now.

But whatever the term means. I know where AGI stands for, but the term "agi" is still very vague. You can't compare a machine llm model with the human brain.

[–] Jestzer@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Hey, we have AGI! We’ve had it for years! It’s called making babies 😎😎😎😎😎

[–] Olap@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

Yet still hallucinates mass bullshit and can't count, can't architect, and can't write a decent test

[–] sobchak@programming.dev 3 points 2 days ago

The "best" one I've tried is the latest Opus. I don't trust any of them to use for real work, so I mostly just play around with a local Qwen 3.6 27B or Deepseek v4 Flash. I have heard OpenAI's latest models produce less bloat than Anthropic's.

I should say I do find LLMs useful as a kind of search agent (both web and large unfamiliar code bases). And GhidraMCP is pretty cool (maybe just because I don't have much experience with reverse engineering).