this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2026
1154 points (99.1% liked)

People Twitter

10401 readers
234 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major celebrity, figure or any politician. You can replace the addres of .x.com to xcancel.com in the address. https://web.archive.org/save is an option. Archive.is is no longer recommended because they remove/alter content.
  7. If a tweet (or similar) makes a statement of fact, either mark it as "satire" in the body or provide the original source link backing up the statement (see rule 6)

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SalamiDommie@lemmus.org 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

1 - it usually gets them a tax write off 2 - they do little other than talk about it and any explanation of their involvement is usually heavily exaggerated (except maybe John Cena's make a wish work) 3 - they view their name attachment as worth enough, and people aupplaide them for the lip service, further feeding their narcissism 4 - it is wielded around with their superiority complex, leveraged against others more often than not 5 - the orgs themselves mostly go to funding their leadership groups. Where the largest cost (overhead) is paid before money actually makes it claimed place of benefit. The largest part of the overhead are the leadership and executive members. And they make CRAZY money for "non-profit" positions.

[–] protist@retrofed.com 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That's a lot of generalizing. Sure, there are dysfunctional nonprofits and some overall bad people, but there are also some amazing nonprofits and people doing great work. I don't like painting this with a broad brush like that

[–] SalamiDommie@lemmus.org 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Having worked for them - I am okay with guilty until proven otherwise. Because those who are legit prove so quickly.

[–] protist@retrofed.com 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

When you say "them," like who are you talking about? That's what I'm talking about, using the term "them" to mean "all nonprofits" is fucking awful

[–] SalamiDommie@lemmus.org 1 points 2 months ago

Most non-profits. And if you want to continue to support them as though most of them are good or a net positive then you are a fool.