this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2026
211 points (93.8% liked)
Technology
86354 readers
3486 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Basically Apple will be building the perfect computers to run local LLMs.
One can only hope that it totally breaks the AI/LLM at industrial scale, so businesses can run their own AI systems with their own data sets.
No more of this fucking datacanter horseshit.
It's pretty obvious at this point that the data centers are for storing massive amounts of video.
Where else will flock put all their recordings of us
Local LLMs are cool but also pretty slow compared to cloud. If you have to wait half an hour for your Feature while coding you might still opt for the cloud agent.
Yes, they are slower. However, I think that the pricing we’re going to see from the cloud providers might be enough to deter quite a lot of people. At least I hope so:
The fact that we’re already used to blazing speed generation kinda sucks. Local models are a much more sustainable way of unlocking the benefits of LLMs than giant ecosystem- and community-destroying data centers.
I also hope that don’t get me wrong, but as I said: Waiting for the LLM agent to finish coding is currently a bottleneck in software development, they don’t pay high salaries for watching the AI code, they will prefer faster agents even if they are expensive, because they are not only paying the AI Company but also the software engineer overseeing them.
I think that is only going to last as long as the AI providers are willing to operate at a loss. The issue is even with the newer higher price points rolled out this year, they're still losing money. The slower AI machines may be the answer once the REAL profit earning price for the use tokens hits the market. I forsee lots of alternative work going on while the small LLM's are cooking the data. We will have to see once these machines start to roll out, what the use for LLMs will be and how it's applied. I am hopeful.
Yeah. But they're slow because most of us are GPU peasants. If someone were willing to drop $3-5K on a rig, they could probably run decent, dense models at greater than cloud speeds. Hell, with enough black magic, they could do it with less, but they'd have to go deep into the weeds.
OTOH, $3-5K buys you a shit ton on Open Router, Claude, Chat, Lumo etc.
The game is entirely rigged for "you will own nothing and be happy about it".
If I buy a rig I might as well host it on the internet to get back some of the investment and sell the compute to others … wait a minute that’s cloud!
It’s always cheaper to have the same hardware serve multiple people than just one.
Yes. People occasionally talk about pooling resources / creating a co-op to buy something like this. Easier to split $200K purchase (and probably $10k/month electricity costs) if 200-2000 people chip in. But then...that's just the cloud with extra steps.
Can't says I've ever seen a co-op like that work but ICBW
Have you tried running a local model on a M series Mac?
Yes ofc I ran Gemma 4 for example, but compare that to the speed of Gemini in the cloud the difference is massive.
How much RAM do you have and which version of the model did you run?
Local LLMs can be just as fast as long your device clears the requirements. If you noticed a huge difference, there’s a really good chance that you tried to use a model that requires more RAM than you have
I ran Gemma 4 31 B quantized so it fits in my RAM. The decoding speed was decent, but if you look at the newest models for example Gemini flash 3.5 they have a decoding speed of 280 token per second, they generate an entire page before my Mac locally generates a sentence.
That is a bit too much for your hardware, even the Q4_0. You needed a smaller version (26B likely would suit you better. It would be faster and is a MoE)
Actually they can be much faster given sufficient VRAM and not a lot of concurrent users.
I guess it depends on your definition of perfect - cheap, good or fast.
This thing is probably going to cost at least $20K USD.
Edit:
"Next year's base M7 processor is expected to arrive in the first half of 2027 and will also upgrade memory bandwidth to about 240 GB/s."
That's...really fucking slow. What's the goal here - CGI, engineering sims, game dev etc? 1.5TB is cool but at 240GB/s that will crawl for AI use.
Comparison: this is about $100K, for 7.2TB/s, 252GB VRAM (+500GB system ram, so closer to 750GB total)
https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/products/workstations/dgx-station/
It’s likely wrong reporting, the m5 ultra gets 614 GB/s today. The m3 pro gets over 800. The rumored m5 pro is 1.2TB/s. Likely this will be 2.4 TB/s, but half the reason for high bandwidth in nvidia chips is somewhat offset in the unified scheme. Mlx needs a lot less copy data around when the gpu can just read it directly.
Something got reported on incorrectly because the M5 Max's have 614 GB/s today, and the Ultra M4 machine's (not laptops) are 819 and that's 3 generations behind a M7 if they make an M7 ultra machine.
$ for $ you'll get more video ram than paying for a 5090, but it won't be as fast and can't train well.
Before the ram price decable, you could get a 192gb M4 Ultra for ~10k CAD.
While Apple computers generally will have better support, they will be very slow due to unified memory itself. I'm not sure if this is actually the future.
Only if they can figure out how to emulate CUDA. Or maybe more containers will start providing alternatives if the machines are popular enough?
There’s still a lot of image and OCR workflows I have to chug through the CPU and it takes forever.