this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2026
1559 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

86354 readers
3416 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] python@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Fuck those glasses. But also, my brain can't let go of the question of "How would I feel if I saw a woman wearing these?". And honestly I'm not sure??? Like you could make an argument that at least they would deter creepy men?? Anyone got any thoughts on that?

[–] LwL@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago

Women can be creeps too. It's less common but there are still plenty.

[–] kevinsky@feddit.nl 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Why would these deter creeps if all the existing surveillance measures and social pressure we already have is evidently ineffective? You're talking about the sort of people that have no problem posting highly inappropriate comments on women's instagram profiles under their own name.

And at the end this is still a Meta product, which is at least 50 percent of the problem with these glasses. It's not just some private device, all that footage gets sucked into some big cloud to serve who knows what clandestine purpose.

[–] willington@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

For me it's less about the creepy wearer than it is about surveillance, billionaires, fascism, capitalism, AI training, resale of info, etc.

It's not as important WHO is wearing the camera glasses. A woman, a child, a cat? Where is the data going? What happens with the data? How will it be used for profit or for control which is profit again?

You know if some billionaire wasn't laughing all the way to the bank this would not be happening.

[–] ShotDonkey@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Are we really at our last straw? I mean c'mon, there must be other ways to make women feel safe other than equipping them with a surveillance product from a toxic tech bro.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

That's what I was thinking. There ae a lot of "cons" but is there any "pro"? All I could think of was safety or, at least a quick vid of who killed you.