this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2026
111 points (98.3% liked)

Technology

86354 readers
3208 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FireWire400@lemmy.world 18 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

Jokes on you because it never had any real value to begin with

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 11 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

While I detest Elon, the company definitely has some value. They’re still the global launch leader at this time. That said, their valuation based on promises of AI and asteroid mining is complete nonsense.

[–] ozymandias117@lemmy.world 1 points 6 minutes ago

It had value, before it bought xAI.

Now there's an infinite money pit attached to it

[–] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social -1 points 38 minutes ago (2 children)

Sure, but you are talking about being the leader in an industry that has historically been the profitless province of state sponsored exploration, scientific discovery, with supplementing industrial functions as a value-add. It is not a given what value there actually is in being the leader in this field.

[–] dogslayeggs@lemmy.world 3 points 15 minutes ago (1 children)

It's almost like things are fundamentally different now from "historically." Historically, we (I'm in the launch vehicle industry) didn't have reusable launch vehicles. Even 10 years ago the launch community was hugely skeptical of being able to successfully refurbish a rocket and maintain mission assurance.

My point is that most of the launches being performed now are not state sponsored or for scientific discovery. You are looking at it from the lens of a period when there were only two providers and only a few customers. With tons of commercial companies interested in proliferated LEO programs, there is a lot of profit in launch.

However, that STILL only gives the stock a value of around $8/share.

[–] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 1 points 7 minutes ago

If you took the state funding out of Space X how much money do they make?

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 1 points 13 minutes ago

That was because it was so costly to get even a single kg into orbit. The commercial satellite industry is a quarter of a trillion dollars and growing in part because the cost to get stuff in orbit is going down.