this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2026
247 points (97.3% liked)

Technology

86413 readers
3151 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Remind me to avoid Hyundai like the plague. Every time one of these automation plans goes live, the quality of products falls off a cliff.

[–] Curiositymonger@reddthat.com 14 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Every other carmaker will do the same if it works, because there is strong competition in the market for cars. For ethics around workers being replaced by technology, changing the law to protect workers is the only way.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 14 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

Every other carmaker will do the same if it works

[–] lectricleopard@lemmy.world 5 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I personally dont think it will succeed in actually reducing the labor force that much. Its the eyeballs, brains and finger dexterity they wont match for quite some time. We can see a problem and respond with appropriate novel solutions. I mean just stuff falling over and all the other everyday things, we do that aren't on thr official agenda. Theyll have 1 real guy following around the bucket of bolts fixing his mistakes.

[–] AlteredEgo@lemmy.ml 1 points 11 hours ago

Robots are getting better bit by bit. Basically the percentage of the population that has a certain "skill ceiling" is slowly growing.

[–] redsand@infosec.pub 3 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

It's a Hyundai. The cliff was under water. They're basically grade A KIAs.

[–] Uebercomplicated@lemmy.ml 3 points 10 hours ago

The ionic 5 is really good, imho

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

Kias have been good for years.

They're rated comparably to Honda, Mazda, Toyota.

A little lower than Nissan or Lexus

Way better than BMW, lincoln.

Hyundai, of course, are similar

They're not amazing, but if you think they're trash you're stuck in the '90s. Or basing on feels not facts

[–] Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world 1 points 29 minutes ago

Ehhhhhhhh.

We have two Kias. An EV6 and a Telluride, so their EV and gas lines.

They’re nice looking cars, but the “Kia quality” definitely creeps in. If we didn’t get them on dirt cheap leases I would probably be pissed lol.

[–] redsand@infosec.pub 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

The KIA boys disagree. They were cheap crap in the 00s and the 10s and I really doubt their software in the 20s models is any kind of secure. Doubt their power trains will age well either, the Ioniq might be ok for an Ev but I wouldn't.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 0 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Well, then, you are uneducated.

I mean, security maybe but that's an industry problem.

[–] redsand@infosec.pub 1 points 6 hours ago

No. The 10s are garbage. There are a few years of 00s sonatas that were OK if you didn't get a lemon but trash overall, the Korean Hewlett Packard of car manufacturing.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I had a Sonata that I drove into the ground over 15 years. Loved it. Only gave up on the car when I got rear-ended and my insurance decided to total the vehicle rather than pay for repairs.