this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2026
258 points (92.4% liked)

Fuck AI

7560 readers
1150 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] a_non_monotonic_function@lemmy.world 43 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Eeh, I don't think he is going to stop tearing people a new one for submitting bad code, though. He lives for the flame.

[–] kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 4 days ago (2 children)

And the problem with LLM code is that it's often bad and has a lot of volume. If their process for rejecting bad human code can scale to also reject bad LLM code, I don't see a problem with allowing for the possibility that someone submits LLM code worth accepting.

[–] fistac0rpse@fedia.io 6 points 4 days ago

just use an LLM to review the code, duh /s

[–] bus_factor@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

Last time I saw Linus in the news he was ripping into someone submitting a huge blob of code after the deadline, and said that would not be going into the next kernel. So he's at least expecting humans to review things thoroughly, otherwise why allocate time for human review?