this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2026
154 points (97.0% liked)
Technology
86413 readers
2864 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The entire world is running on borrowed money
Which means someone is out there collecting the interest cost of all that magic money...
Guess who it is!
Satan. Capitalisms biggest fan, next to right wing christians
Hey, Satan got shafted. They asked some questions about the status quo, felt the hereditary monarchy was unfair, led a popular protest, and got exiled as a result. No more anti-Satan Jehovan propoganda.
Depends on if you look at the character from a Christian point of view, or as an outsider. Because from a objective point of view, he looks like the good guy in the bible. I was just telling my point from their point of view
Yeah, that title doesn't make any sense. Do they mean AI companies are moving from equity to debt financing? I can't get to the article (paywalled).
Credit is a huge part of the advancement of civilization. The "one treat now vs. five treats later" test is used as a measure of intelligence for a reason.
It's used as a test of basic intelligence, but it's also seriously incomplete and maybe a test of more advanced intelligence would be to have someone explain at least some of the many ways in which it's incomplete.
If I told you to let me have your 5 treats later so that I can turn them into more treats than there are particles in the entire universe and I'll give you half, you should probably call bullshit on that.
If I'm starving to death and I'm not going to survive until however much "later" is unless I eat one of those treats right now, then choosing "five treats later" would actually be the wrong choice.
This is not always a clear choice, either. The test is interesting, and it tells you a lot about how certain people think, but it isn't universal, and it doesn't actually prove anything. You need to understand and interpret why the answer makes sense in each context. And the context is always changing. We live on a changing planet. It is time to start thinking about how the context of "5 treats later" might have changed, and whether we are going to survive until whenever "later" is, and whether it is actually physically possible to provide all of those 5 treats in the hypothetical future that we are imagining.