this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2026
489 points (99.2% liked)

Fuck AI

7560 readers
1150 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
VerbFlow@lemmy.world
MrMcGasion@lemmy.world
TootSweet@lemmy.world
BigMikeInAustin@lemmy.world
cynar@lemmy.world
drmeanfeel@lemmy.world
pavnilschanda@lemmy.world
CriticalMedicine@lemmy.world
WonderfulWanderer@lemmy.world
Communist@lemmy.ml
eatCasserole@lemmy.world
SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
NutWrench@lemmy.world
Soup@lemmy.cafe
iAvicenna@lemmy.world
Tinks@lemmy.world
wizblizz@lemmy.world
corus_kt@lemmy.world
TrickDacy@lemmy.world
andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works
MeDuViNoX@sh.itjust.works
33550336@lemmy.world
Nougat@fedia.io
Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
Quill7513@slrpnk.net
glowing_hans@sopuli.xyz
e8d79@discuss.tchncs.de
ThefuzzyFurryComrade@pawb.social
489
The DOJ is using fake "AI" case citations to justify ICE detainment (infosec.pub)
submitted 4 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) by CubitOom@infosec.pub to c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world
45 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

cross-posted from: https://infosec.pub/post/49593520

Source

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.miwd.120609/gov.uscourts.miwd.120609.11.0.pdf

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CubitOom@infosec.pub 19 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

I don't think LLMs are great at figuring out if something is written by an LLM, or factual.

[–] greedytacothief@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

I wouldn't have it do that. I'm thinking more along the lines of an AI that drafts legal documents.

  • It would find a reference to a case, something an ai is good at.
  • Then it would send out a query to the database to check if that case exists, something you would need to build some tooling for.
  • If it retrieves anything it would then check if the source and the document agree
  • if not, it would run a loop to re-write that section.

I'm not like an agent engineer or anything like that, and I'm sure there's more efficient ways of having an LLM draft legal documents. But so long as you can get it to reference primary sources there should be a lot less cleanup work to do.

[–] Oisteink@lemmy.world -1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

You dont need to - you just have to make sure you set up one or two to find holes. Make it 50 points per hole, and 1000 bonus if all is proved wrong. Make two compete and let them know

[–] Oisteink@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

And then you can have more that check those results for faults!! With only 500 agents working full time you have quite a great setup

[–] x1gma@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

"Who watches the watchers?", that problem is far older than both me, you and every LLM.