this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2026
293 points (99.0% liked)
Fuck AI
7560 readers
1245 users here now
"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"
A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.
AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
As far as I know, there is no artificial selection in an evolutionary sense other than maybe selective breeding and genetic modifications etc. But natural selection refers ofc to darwin theory of evolution. So i would call it artificial, if there is a clear intent behind it, by someone, for example tge ai being designed to drive all believers to kill themselfs. But since this is a random occurance that was not intentional i don't think it categorizes as artificial selection.
Natural selection means "died before being able to reproduce". Darwin also specified sexual selection which means "unable (or less able) to find a mate or incapable (or less capable) of reproduction". Artificial selection is "humans intentionally fucked with their reproduction or genes to select for traits".
Ai could fall into any of the three depending on situation and perspective.
Ok, thanks for that.
The reason i ask this is because from my perspective I'm not sure anything humans do could be considered outside of nature.
We are part of it so anything we do is also part of it.
That's not to imply we aren't stupidly destructive sometimes, but even technology is still something we built, like tool-use apes or birds.
The difference is in magnitude, not in type.
There are plenty of creatures that affect the environment around them , with or without tool-use. Sometimes those actions destroy their own habitats, things like overpopulation or key resource exhaustion.
That we are currently the pinnacle of fucking up our own environment doesn't differentiate us from other natural creatures, other than scale.
Even the idea of sentience and sapience could be considered evolution of a sort.
Yes, we have greater understanding about our actions and the consequences, but that's only as a result of traits formed by evolutionary pressures, i wouldn't consider cognitive abilities to be outside of nature either.
To follow on from that, selective breeding, for instance, would still be natural selection because the environment in which is happens contains only natural elements.
People sometimes get upset at the idea that we aren't special enough to considered "above" or "outside" nature which i why i try and get their perspective first.