this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2026
345 points (99.7% liked)
Fuck AI
7560 readers
2319 users here now
"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"
A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.
AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
That's why university evaluations should be always in pen and paper.
this is just unacceptable, those students should be just expelled without mercy IMO.
Or at least give students computers that have restricted or no access to the internet? Even before LLMs having access to the internet would have been a huge opportunity to cheat. At least in most subjects.
Also, what happened to teachers/supervisors walking around and checking if the students cheat? Back when I went to school we also cheated with cheat sheets or exchanging answers but it was always risky because getting busted meant failing the test (or worse).
Letting students use the internet unrestrictedly would be like the teacher leaving the room and letting us unsupervised for the duration of the test back in my days.
could be... they made me programa python on paper.
for introduction to programming, basically you had to try to run the program on your head lmao.
Ah yes, let's make it so everyone that is physically disabled or lacking in dexterity fails tests, just like the good old days.
/Sarcasm
Or we do like the current days and give reasonable accomodations for those that need them while still preserving the integrity of the exam?
why do people keep using this accessibility argument for AI? Is it cause y'all can't 'think of the children' your way to getting the ignorant to agree?
Who said I was being pro-AI?
I'm being pro-disabity, that's all. AI can get in a bin.
I think he was "arguing" (not sure, as there's the added /s) about the pen and paper. Not everyone can use a pen well, there's also accessibility needs for people with severe dyslexia and such.
This is ridiculous, in my uni is pen and paper, and people with physical or mental disabilities get accommodations so they can perform as good as other people, I myself have some due to autism.
What is not OK is just to give a medium to enable cheaters like this.
Oh, even your students that are unable to use a pen and paper? Neat, don't know how they do it
Yeah, it's interesting seeing some professors complaining about how AI has made catching cheaters harder now.
But then you see that they are letting students have access to phones and laptops during exam with no software/Internet restriction and you think...yeah I wonder why...what could possibly be done...
Not allow them those devices for a subject like history during an exam? No impossible.
When I brought it up here a teacher went lol but they have phones and tablets. As if its not worth even trying to prevent. And also they said they didn't want to do paper and pencil either because its too much work to grade.
There are programs that completely lock down laptops for exams preventing you from using internet, going to the desktop, open other docs, etc so its not like it has to be paper and pencil to prevent AI usage. But, its like some professors just can't wrap their head around the concept of not allowing full access to electronics or none at all despite the subject matter not being something like programming, but history.