465
Flock misread license plates in 71% of the alerts it sent to police in one California town
(www.businessinsider.com)
this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2026
465 points (99.2% liked)
Technology
86735 readers
3337 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I did not know there was only one single Flock camera in the city of 150 000 people, or in California, or the USA in general. lol.
Oh, kinda looks like they have more. 20 billion reads a month, huh. That's 7610 scan a second. Fancy that.
I don't think you understand their point. The point is that the OCR can be done on a distributed system, because a distributed system is what the cameras already are.
My biggest contention with this claim is whether the computers onboard the license plate readers are actually capable of doing this with solar power and battery capacity, but considering I'd rather they didn't exist anyway...
Flock cameras process the images locally for plate recognition. It’s only after the image of the plate has been converted into text that the plate number (or in this instance the number it has misinterpreted) is sent to AWS for matches and alerts. The issue sounds like it’s at the individual camera level.
...yes?
The cameras around the US scan 7000 plates per second, trying to figure out what they say with 8000 different possible plate designs around the country, and those results are then matched to a database of stolen vehicles and other plates , which there's roughly 600k reported stolen in the US each year so. That database is going to be massive.
That means every second, 7000 strings of letters and numbers OCR'd at unknown conditions and accuracy are being compared to hundreds of thousands of stolen plates. They are guaranteed to get a number of "matches" constantly, most of them from reads that were not accurate.
And specifically because they aren't sent anywhere, nobody can double check the picture to see if the camera got it anywhere right at all.
Yes the entire system saving that text, and maybe a still image handles that many... But the single camera taking each photo where the actual OCR processing is done ON THE CAMERA HARDWARE ITSELF only needs to handle maybe one or two each second... And only if it is looking at a busy road. At the distances these cameras can process, most are not handling a lot simultaneously. And very busy roads will have different hardware than the lower end camera systems used in most places.
You HAVE to purposely be trying NOT to understand any of the responses to you here. No one could possibly be that stupid unintentionally.
Holy fuck you're daft, good luck
What does any of this have to do with the cameras from one specific town being wrong a majority of the time? Not that it would be better if it wad the average across the nation. It would be much, much worse actually.