I'm a fairly hostile atheist, but I can respect how they've handled this. They wanted to support their position, but didn't want it to be in everyone's face, so they did it discreetly, out of respect for their non-religious customers.

That's the kind of reasonable compromise required of the 1st Amendment, so when I see that, I have to respect it, even if I don't agree with it. They have their right to their religious beliefs, as I do to reject them. I'm not going skip their excellent and reasonably priced food over a few religious verses.

If they start financially supporting preachers who promote the execution of gays, and convince African countries to make it the law or some other such bullshit, like Chikfila or Hobby Lobby does, then I'll reassess.

Man, they sure are religious for a food chain named after a sexual act.

I mean, they're well known for being a Christian company. It's not particularly surprising.

In a perfect world, I'd go to the left-wing-donating equivalent, but until they show up or In-N-Out stops being an otherwise commendable company (charity work for addiction centers and trafficked children, much higher wages than competitors, (mostly) clean and well maintained establishments), they're on the docket to get my $9.98 when I don't have the time or energy to make dinner.

I think their consistency has gone down. If you get a top tier In-N-Out burger, where the cheese has just started to melt and the bun was toasted just right, they're pretty damn good burgers, would still be worth it if it cost an extra $2-3. The mid to low tier In-N-Out burgers are about worth their current price.