this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2026
453 points (91.9% liked)

Technology

86879 readers
3714 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] XLE@piefed.social 18 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

The article (Hank Green understanding himself) and the comment I was responding to (Hank Green misleading people about AI) are two similar different topics that can and should be judged separately.

I was responding to the person who said he was generally trustworthy about the topic in general, with what I think is a significant counterexample.

[–] Sidyctism2@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 day ago

Ohh jesus, that video (the one with nate soares) was actually the first hank green video i watched (wasnt aware of either them at the time). Though what i remember from my reaction i was mainly pissed off that the video is called "chatgpt isnt smart. Its something much weirder" and than basically doesnt discuss matters of intelligence or similiarities/ differences between human intellect and machine "intellect" at all. Instead we got this worthless moneyquote "this is alchemy" from soares, which even made it onto the thumbnail.

[–] bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I guess it's up to the reader to determine if the linked article from a few days ago of Hank reflecting bullish attitude should be judged separately from the articles and videos months ago about his behavior he has since identified as problematic. Maybe he used to be a piece of shit, not anymore? People can change.

[–] XLE@piefed.social 7 points 1 day ago

I don't associate these two different events as evidence of a shift in personal stances, because they can both be things he believes at the same time. That also means that hopefully people can empathize with him even while disagreeing with his stances about some things.

(If his stance did change, that would be great and I wouldn't want to deny it, but his video promoting AI lobbyists is still unfortunately up.)

[–] cattywampas@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Slicked back hair, sloppy steaks at Truffoni's.

[–] bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 day ago

People can change