this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2026
999 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

86922 readers
4543 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Sixty minutes. That’s how long it took for a private Snapchat message to travel from Kristen Volpe’s phone to the FBI to the deputies standing in her elementary school hallway. On January 29, 2025, the 22-year-old student teacher at John L. Hensey Elementary in Washington, Illinois, vented to her boyfriend and two roommates — three people total — after a student closed her laptop mid-class and wiped her lesson plan. She referenced shooting the student or the school. She meant it as a frustrated joke. Snapchat’s algorithm didn’t get the humor.

No student reported her. No parent. No coworker. The flag was entirely automated. Snapchat’s policy permits voluntary emergency disclosures to law enforcement — no warrant required — when the platform determines imminent harm exists. The algorithm makes that initial call. Think of it like your Ring doorbell deciding to call 911 on its own, except the doorbell is reading your text messages.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net -1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

For now, it sounds like the US and the EU are effectively the same on this matter.

One is as of now sending police to interrogate people over text messages and the other is not even scanning anything locally (Chat Control 1.0 allows scanning but no one is actually doing this). "Effectively the same...." People have lost all sense of proportion on this. One has currently implemented automated system to alarm police about possible school shootings based on a single text message where police is actually responding in minutes (not to mention full monitoring of kids school computers and actual police officers assaulting children in schools!) and the other doesn't even consider school shooting a meaningful risk and does not surveils kids or teachers in any way. Yes, you're right. It's pretty much the same.

I will just give up now. Doesn't make a lot of sense to talk with deranged people.

[–] db_null@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

When I say "the US and the EU are effectively the same on this matter" then I talk about the legal framework that is allowing this to happen. Snapchat can scan in the EU as they did in the US.

You say this is not happening, and honestly I don't know if anyone is currently scanning under Chat Control 1 or not. It sounds to me though they could if they wanted to. Has nothing of interest come up yet? Are they scared of GDPR? If they find something, maybe they are reluctant because the public sentiment towards privacy is different and this would blow up in their face? Maybe you are right and they simply don't scan. I would not rely on it though.

Of course the lived situation in the US is significantly more oppressive than in the EU. The crimes of ICE, the constant surveillance with flock, the fcc threatening free speech.. it's insane. We need to make sure that in the EU the situation won't escalate as quickly as it did in the US, because there are plenty political parties and some governments who are trying.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Yes, and in both US and rest of the world police can use deadly force when their life is in danger. The laws are effectively the same. In practice:

Talking about what "legal framework" allows to happen while ignoring reality is pointless, disingenuous and purposefully misleading.

[–] db_null@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You lost me mate, and my patience for the insults has run thin too. All the best to you

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

You got confused by a simple comparison? No wonder you don't understand anything about Chat Control.