this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2026
851 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

86860 readers
3661 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Sixty minutes. That’s how long it took for a private Snapchat message to travel from Kristen Volpe’s phone to the FBI to the deputies standing in her elementary school hallway. On January 29, 2025, the 22-year-old student teacher at John L. Hensey Elementary in Washington, Illinois, vented to her boyfriend and two roommates — three people total — after a student closed her laptop mid-class and wiped her lesson plan. She referenced shooting the student or the school. She meant it as a frustrated joke. Snapchat’s algorithm didn’t get the humor.

No student reported her. No parent. No coworker. The flag was entirely automated. Snapchat’s policy permits voluntary emergency disclosures to law enforcement — no warrant required — when the platform determines imminent harm exists. The algorithm makes that initial call. Think of it like your Ring doorbell deciding to call 911 on its own, except the doorbell is reading your text messages.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] WindyRebel@lemmy.world 7 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I am a teacher who finished his student teaching the past school year in the Chicagoland area.

I just want to say…the FUCK? This woman was pissed because a student closed her laptop? She claims it “wiped” her lesson plan? No. I’m calling baloney on that story. Her stuff was saved in a cloud environment and would’ve been recovered easily or the OS would’ve saved the working doc.

If this student teacher was frustrated over this extremely small thing, and made a comment like that even “joking” then she is not cut out to be a teacher. At. All. This incident also just killed her career. No school will hire her with this story out there. What a moronic thing to do/say!

The tech issue of flagging this is just a whole other issue though and a good reminder to be careful of context because we are being monitored even when seemingly not.

[–] ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com -2 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I'd like to shoot myself after reading this stupid comment. Should I go ahead and start baking cookies for the agents. I wonder if they want coffee?

Everyone is unhinged. Get a grip.

[–] WindyRebel@lemmy.world 7 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

I’m sorry, but what? I’m a dad to a teen and a new teacher as well, so I have experience in this area.

Everyone is unhinged. Get a grip.

You really don’t understand the profession of teaching if that’s your takeaway of what I said. We all get frustrated with students, but to plainly say “shoot” them, while in a literal school and over social media because a student closed your laptop?

A student teacher shouldn’t be this frustrated at this point in their career or they should consider a different career. Kids do this stuff all the time, especially to each other. Open the laptop, boot up, recover the documents/projects. It’s really not a big deal that warrants a comment about shooting a kid, even as a joke.

If you really feel that is acceptable, then thank you for not teaching kids.

[–] ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

It was a joke under an assumption of privacy.

[–] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 0 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Its a shitty joke. Having consequences for saying something is an okay thing. I agree that they should rethink teaching if this is their perspective. Are we just supposed to let them teach for a decade or two and hope they mellow out? Teachers are supposed to be leaders, they have a higher bar to meet.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

We're supposed to not find out that the joke was made in private and judge her based on how she acts outside of private

[–] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 1 points 17 hours ago

Private is the thoughts in your head, everything else is public. This teacher didn't need to actually say the thought out loud, it could just stay a shitty thought in their head. Maybe they could try some introspection, about why they are so frustrated over something so trivial. Maybe consider why they are so quick to have violent thoughts about people they are in charge of.

Also, besides all of this, who ever thought Snapchat was a private place, even using your definition of the word? They sent a death threat to a public company that is very clear that they monitor the content that flows through their servers.

Context matters, you can't just leave out the details and say "any privacy violation is bad". That's not how society works or else wed all be living alone in caves.

[–] DudleyMason@lemmy.ml 0 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

No.

If you think there's anything acceptable about arresting someone and nuking their career over a joke made in a private forum, you are the one with no business being anywhere near kids. You won't teach them anything except how to be good subservient little serfs for their corporate masters, and that's the last thing any kid needs to hear more of.

Please consider another career. I hear the military is a great place for bootlickers. And with your contempt for freedom and privacy you'd probably make a great cop.

[–] WindyRebel@lemmy.world 3 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

You’re going on about bootlickers when the entire point of my post was about teachers should not be making any comments, whatsoever, about shooting a kid.

I can’t believe how wrong some of you Lemmy people are about this whole thing and the critical thinking you all are applying. I’m not even talking about the legality or morality of the tech of it, but rather on this person’s demeanor in a demanding profession with 20-25 different personalities and needs who will test you.

By the way, do you need a hug? 🤗

[–] DudleyMason@lemmy.ml 1 points 13 hours ago

You’re going on about bootlickers

If it bothers you so much maybe stop deepthroating that boot for a minute so we can talk.

the entire point of my post was about teachers should not be making any comments, whatsoever, about shooting a kid.

The entire point of your post was that thoughtcrime is totally valid and should be punishable with state violence and enforced poverty. That makes you a useful idiot for fascism and just a generic idiot for everyone else.

can’t believe how wrong some of you Lemmy people are about this whole thing and the critical thinking you all are applying

Maybe you should try some critical thinking of your own then, and realize that thoughtcrime is never a valid concept.

A teacher joking about shooting a student is no more horrible, nor any less likely than an ER doc joking about motorcyclists being "walking organ donors". Cops showing up because an AI ratted out a joke someone made in private is 1000 times more horrific and dangerous than someone making a joke you think is over the line.

By the way, do you need a hug?

No, I need a world where "but it's to protect kids!" doesn't automatically make most people just happily accept any idiocy the speaker wants to assert.

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 0 points 20 hours ago (1 children)
[–] WindyRebel@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I work in it, as well as the state in which this happened. Do you?

There is literally no acceptable reason for a teacher to make a comment about shooting a kid. Ever.

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago

Yeah, maybe, but neither is a reason for the thought police to show up.

Now, if she started stockpiling guns and making plans, that's a different story.

But, don't worry, the fascists are watching, hope you're not the wrong religion, or God forbid a minority.