this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2026
881 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

86860 readers
3564 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
881
Student Teacher Sent a Private Snapchat Complaining About Her Workday. An Hour Later, Police Pulled Up to Her School. (www.gadgetreview.com)
submitted 1 day ago by spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works to c/technology@lemmy.world
407 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Sixty minutes. That’s how long it took for a private Snapchat message to travel from Kristen Volpe’s phone to the FBI to the deputies standing in her elementary school hallway. On January 29, 2025, the 22-year-old student teacher at John L. Hensey Elementary in Washington, Illinois, vented to her boyfriend and two roommates — three people total — after a student closed her laptop mid-class and wiped her lesson plan. She referenced shooting the student or the school. She meant it as a frustrated joke. Snapchat’s algorithm didn’t get the humor.

No student reported her. No parent. No coworker. The flag was entirely automated. Snapchat’s policy permits voluntary emergency disclosures to law enforcement — no warrant required — when the platform determines imminent harm exists. The algorithm makes that initial call. Think of it like your Ring doorbell deciding to call 911 on its own, except the doorbell is reading your text messages.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NEZ27@lemmy.zip 5 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

  1. You can know things aren't totally private and should still be able to make dumb jokes without the FBI getting involved.

  2. Does a dumb joke about a bad experience really merit a 'reality check'?

  3. Social Media company reporting suspicious stuff is a good thing. What isn't good is the zero due diligence. Just right to the FBI.

  4. It is the fault of the social media for auto-flagging things then automatically forwarding to the FBI. I'd like more due diligence from the FBI too, but we don't know how urgent they thought it was. Again, no due diligence and they auto-forwarded something to the FBI that must have made it seem like an imminent threat.

None of these are good things. Privacy should still be private. If we're going to tacitly accept that nothing is private on the Internet for 'safety', then it should absolutely be called out when that privacy is violated for little to no reason. And again, some due diligence from someone. All of these things being done without anyone looking into it until the FBI is on someone's door step is not good. Let's also note that law enforcement jumping hard on bad information has led to plenty of wrongful deaths and injuries.

[–] nullspace@lemmy.world 0 points 20 hours ago

Don't mistake my opinion as a condemnation of online privacy. My point was privacy doesn't exist on the internet without the proper encryption.

As it relates to the topic I think it was stupid to say something the FBI would perceive as a credible threat on something that wasn't a secure communication. If someone said the same thing in a "private conversation" with an AI chatbot I wouldn't be surprised if the FBI knocked on their door too.