this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2026
109 points (68.7% liked)

Fuck AI

7560 readers
1639 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] vapeloki@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] artwork@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Sorry, this is not the source. May I ask why do you share misinformation?
Not only the article is an entirely different case, has no such chart, but the "clickable links" on the website are fake, too:

[–] vapeloki@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

I clicked all links. None of them are fake. So, what the shit are you talking about?

[–] vapeloki@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

That is the original source I know. The content describes the content of the graph. Where is this misinformation? What did I miss?

[–] Successful_Try543@feddit.org 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

They're complaining that the way "Source" in the image is highlighted implies it's a clickable link, which of course it's not.

Despite that, whether the links in the text are highlighted depends on the browser (which is odd). Using Firefox Focus they are invisible but are highlighted in my stock Andoid browser.

In Addition, the data in the text is global data, the data in the post is US only, so it's not the source of the data of the post.

[–] I_Jedi@lemmy.today 2 points 2 days ago

You missed the part about wp-image-4776.lazyautosizes.lazyloaded. This is a critical part of the lore, because it means the author of that page used WordPress, and is lazy.