this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2026
147 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

43549 readers
218 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

The underlying technology isn't unprofitable, inference alone isn't unprofitable. It's the research and development of better models that's unprofitable and unsustainable.

Investment IS gambling, some people will win, some will lose.

That's pretty much how almost every new development happens. EVs were the same, primarily funded by subsidies and now they're cost competitive or better in many situations even without them. Cellphone networks... also heavily funded by investors and some took hits from how it all played out. The dotcom bubble. Even as far back as the Railroad boom in the UK. This is a tale as old as time.

[–] PRIMEcavitationfetishist@quokk.au 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

isn't unprofitable

Yes it is. The only things its useful and efficient for are all laid out in either '1984' or the Geneva conventions.

[–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Your emotions don't override reality.

LLMs are excellent at translation as one significant beneficial use case.

[–] PRIMEcavitationfetishist@quokk.au 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I wish I could believe you, sloppy, but you're all lying sacks of shit so I can't trust anything you say.

[–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That makes sense, you're clearly not smart enough to know a second language so you can test it out.

[–] PRIMEcavitationfetishist@quokk.au 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Is that what your cat farts said would own me?

[–] IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.wtf 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I wouldn't put a fancy and stupidly resource-intensive word guessing game on the same level as those other things.

[–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Maybe you wouldn't, but I would. You clearly don't remember how bad the internet was when it first became available to the public.

[–] IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.wtf 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Do tell, how has it improved since the times that I clearly don't remember?

[–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago

Other than not blocking your entire phone line while you were on it, paying for hours per month of connectivity, having content take minutes to load, lacking in useful content, a thousand and one different logins with no safety systems attached, constant viruses, and no safe way to pay for things?

Nah, it was great.