You brought up being successful in a broken system being bad. I pointed out how one can do good in a system that's broken, acknowledge that which they can't fix, and not get hung up on it and find happiness. You seemed to take that as an ethical issue, which is why I brought up ethics.
I can't think of an ethical system that requires one to be unhappy while doing good where they can simply because there still exists suffering.

doing good in terms of being generally happy (your interpretation) while seeing the world suffer is the opposite of being empathic

Are you mistaking the word "good" for "well"? Are you thinking I'm saying it's okay to smile at misery? Because what you said was my interpretation doesn't even parse right.

If someone has done everything they can to help those it's in their power to help, and they've done stuff to make a living like "teach astronomy", I don't know how you can say it's worrisome that this person plays with their children at a park, or enjoys a birthday party. I'm not talking specific feelings of happiness at specific moments when contemplating specific news items or aspects of reality, I'm talking general life satisfaction.

The EU drowning thousands of refugees isn't cause for me to have clinical depression. I'm sad when I think about it, but it's beyond my control entirely.

You've still never given any actual examples of not problematic behavior by your metrics, or clarified if you've ever felt happiness.