this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2026
495 points (99.2% liked)
Technology
87183 readers
4519 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
It's really not. No more than a casino is requiring you to roll dice and flip cards.
People can just... not host their shit on the site. Or not be in the influencer/content creator business entirely.
People are being baited into doing this work. People are being scammed and lied to about their prospects. But nobody is actually making you do this shit, much less do it for free.
She'd be crazy not to pick up and work somewhere else. Or hang her own shingle.
But that's the hitch with YouTube. It's not just not-paying-you. It's also hosting your media for free. What you're really trading on isn't revenue from YouTube, it's free hosting services. And then you need to monetize the content yourself, if you want to generate an income.
Case in point - Ms Rachel isn't getting rich off her (wildly popular) YouTube channel nearly so much as her toy line and her celebrity appearance fees. Similarly, guys like Tucker Carlson and Alex Jones do commercial line reads right in the middle of their shows, fully independent of what YouTube injects. Adam Friedland and Justin Rozniak do paywalled episodes through Patreon. Mr. Beast sells shitty snack food.
Everyone who has made a living on YouTube has ultimately collected the bulk of that money from outside YouTube.
It's honestly insane and kinda selfish and self-defeating to say that the response to a bad situation is to just take your business elsewhere.
Like...we can't just write off everyone else's misery and suffering because you personally found a way to avoid it.
That is literally 99% of the world's problems and thank you for providing a brilliant example at the lowest moral stakes possible.
The degree of privilege required to even entertain making a living as a YouTube starlet is astronomical.
And, again, free video hosting and distribution! That's why 99% of people put videos in YouTube. You can host something and pass it around without needing a self-hosted solution to manage it.
That's the business model. It's not Netflix
In the beginning, YT was more like what you describe. It’s not anymore.
Where you are wrong is that it is Netflix now.
YT sees themselves as a competitor to Netflix. They have said this publicly. And Netflix is trying to compete with YT. They are actively managing it like Netflix without paying anyone for the “shows” that gets added to their streaming service.